Tessera
Folgen

Ashton Parangosky

@parangosky.bsky.social

Jackalope, Shark, wolfskin studio suiter. 26 y/o. Alaskan transplant

600 Posts371 Follower1146 Folgt
jessamyn@librarian.bsky.social · last wk.

I work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful

An aircraft passenger oxygen mask: a drop down passenger mask with air bag and yellow plastic mouth and nose cover, oxygen tube has been cut; Demonstration model used by flight attendant crew for passenger instruction. Has text on the side indicating that it's non-functional.
Azel@azeldraws.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Washington- they’re trying the internet age restriction stuff here. Do you want to give up *your* privacy because someone else can’t properly parent *their* children? Comment, call, don’t let it pass!

Amras, Scéal Faoladh θ∆@amras.me · 7mo ago

Do you live in Washington State? I need you to do two things: 1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112. 2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill. This is SERIOUS shit. Please! My comment in the BLUE images.

I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution. Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individuals—the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112—to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children. Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque!
Merrill Before and Sometimes After Dark@merrillotter.com · 9mo ago

Increasingly I feel like I favor furry because it espouses the idea that humans, for all our mastery over nature, are still animals. We need to nap and wander and frolic and utter strange noises. It is good for us to be weird little guys, which is something society is so committed to stripping away.

SNAP JAW@snapjaw.bsky.social · last yr.

✨️We have started a raffle for a free custom hood!✨️ We will create any design (except realistic skulls, and not including accessories like Mohawks) 1) Join the SnapJaw Telegram Channel. 2) Interact with this post’s join button and be sure the bot (@y9prizebot) can mention you: t.me/SnapJaw/107117

BildBildBildBild