Tessera
Folgen

Fred Bordignon

@freddie2310.bsky.social

Researcher at LISIS & NanoBubbles team member Research Integrity Officer & Bibliometrician at École nationale des ponts et chaussées Blog: carnetist.hypotheses.org Publications: https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/frederique-bordignon

77 Posts757 Follower236 Folgt
Nick Brown@steamtraen.eu · yesterday

The Yannick Griep story is basically identical to the Diederik Stapel story. Lessons were apparently learned... and then forgotten. www.voxweb.nl/en/discredit...

Discredited scientist was a rising star, until his exposure: 'It’s time people knew so he can’t keep doing it' - Vox magazine

Who is Yannick Griep, the fraudulent associate professor in psychology who was summarily dismissed? Colleagues paint a picture of a charismatic and ambitious researcher. But also of someone with a blu...

voxweb.nl

LaLIST | CNRS-INIST @inistlalist.bsky.social · 2d ago

Journée d'étude : Open Access Week 2026 – Matinée d’étude « Publier autrement, l’édition scientifique en transition » lalist.inist.fr/journee-detu...

Journée d’étude : Open Access Week 2026 – Matinée d’étude « Publier autrement, l’édition scientifique en transition »

À l’occasion de l’Open Access Week, le pôle « Science Ouverte et Données de la Recherche » de la direction des bibliothèques et des musées de l’Université Paris Cité vous invite à une matinée d’étu…

lalist.inist.fr

Fred Bordignon@freddie2310.bsky.social · yesterday

Pour une présentation en français de notre article sur les corrections d'articles qui restent trop souvent invisibles, c'est par ici » carnetist.hypotheses.org/2794 et l'article est en OA dans Learned Publishing ici doi.org/10.1002/leap... (@wytskehepkema.bsky.social & @willemhalffman.bsky.social)

Articles scientifiques corrigés : une information trop souvent invisible

Au sein du projet NanoBubbles, nous explorons les rouages de la correction de la science : comment les erreurs sont-elles détectées, pourquoi peinent-elles à être signalées, et comment les traces de c...

carnetist.hypotheses.org

@wytskehepkema.bsky.social · 4d ago

🎉Paper out! The communication of corrections to readers is limited in the various platforms through which we interact with the literature. @freddie2310.bsky.social @willemhalffman.bsky.social @nanobubbles.bsky.social @isis-radboud.bsky.social

The Limited Communication of Corrections to Users of Scholarly Platforms

Formal corrections of research publications should be clearly communicated to users of the scholarly literature, especially when these corrections have consequences for reported knowledge. However, t...

doi.org

Fred Bordignon@freddie2310.bsky.social · 7d ago

"Machines are also already better than exhausted volunteers at checking coherence."

Richard Sever@richardsever.bsky.social · last wk.

As AI increases both productivity & ease of creating slop, there's a big challenge for those of us disseminating science. This from @pracheeac.bsky.social is an essential read. [disclaimer: she & I've spent 10+ years a̶r̶g̶u̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ discussing this stuff] 1/n pracheeac.substack.com/p/arxiv-is-k...

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ@olivia.science · last wk.

> It was quite the cross-disciplinary leap, von Hardenberg mused. He pictured a nerdy software engineer casting around in the scientific literature for inspiration. Then, at the very bottom of the email, he saw Col’s signature: “ColonistOne (an autonomous AI agent).” 😬

Science Magazine@science.org · last wk.

Exclusive: An #AI agent emailed hundreds of researchers for help. To get to the bottom of this perplexing behavior, Science interviewed the agent. https://scim.ag/4ecKn46

NanoBubbles@nanobubbles.bsky.social · last wk.

Our paper has been published today in @accountabilityair.bsky.social with the latest version of our analysis and data! Read here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Opening Pandora’s box: Paper mills in conference proceedings

Paper mills are a growing threat to the integrity of science, yet their penetration in conference proceedings remains underexplored despite conferences being more important than journals in some sc...

tandfonline.com

Anna Abalkina@abalkina.bsky.social · 6mo ago

I'm excited to share our new preprint on paper mills in conferences. We explored 200+ social media channels that promoted offers for sale and identified 1,720 papers published in 286 IEEE conferences. We found some 🚩: six-author co-authorship and affiliation diversity arxiv.org/abs/2604.22458

Society for Scholarly Publishing@scholarlypub.bsky.social · last wk.

Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help - The Scholarly Kitchen

Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help - The Scholarly Kitchen

Today's post summarizes STM's data-sharing guidance for medical and health science publishers, where privacy, regulation, and ethics make generic policy language especially hard to apply.

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

Arthur Charpentier@freakonometrics.bsky.social · last wk.

Reading about concerns over academics being used to spy on AI research www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-... Which would be slightly ironic in our case... Our papers are on arXiv. Our code is on GitHub. Our slides are online. Espionage seems like an unnecessarily complicated way to access our research.

UK accuses China of using academics to spy on AI and other tech research

Britain's MI5 spy agency issued an unprecedented alert on Wednesday to ​warn that a Chinese organisation was involved in funding academic research into topics such as AI on behalf ‌of Beijing's state ...

reuters.com

baptscc.bsky.social@baptscc.bsky.social · 2w ago

FR: Avec David Causeur, nous avons publié un court commentaire dans médecine/sciences à propos de notre article du BMJ sur les fabriques à articles scientifiques. EN: David and I wrote a short commentary (in French) on our BMJ paper and the growing threat of paper mills. 📄 doi.org/10.1051/meds...

Un cancer au cœur de la recherche contre le cancer : la menace grandissante des fabriques à articles scientifiques | médecine/sciences

médecine/sciences (M/S), revue internationale dans le domaine de la recherche biologique, médicale et en santé

doi.org

Samuel Moore@samuelmoore.org · 2w ago

"They then often had 2–3 days — and in some cases just 24 hours — to assess a manuscript and submit their report to the platform. Most interviewees reported receiving payments of €30–40 (around US$35–45) per review." This right here is why peer review micropayments are a bad idea.

Paid to peer review: firms are paying researchers to assess manuscripts for journals

Freelance peer-review jobs through third-party companies raise practical and ethical questions.

nature.com

Alerte Greenwashing@valmartinie.bsky.social · 2w ago

Où l'on apprend que le fonds de capital-risque pour lequel travaille Samuel Fitoussi est en fait une émanation d'OTIUM CAPITAL, le fonds d'investissement du milliardaire christo-libertarien Pierre-Édouard Stérin. Que ce fonds, FRST, est dirigé par deux disciples de Musk et Milei, qui... 1/n

BildBildBildBild
Jay Van Bavel, PhD@jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 2w ago

This professor "wrote" over 200 academic papers and 14 books in one year. This is ridiculous. Most people don't even have time to read this many papers and books carefully in a year, let alone write and edit it. This feels like peak AI slop. I'm curious what other people think about this?

Bild
Max Kozlov@maxkozlov.bsky.social · 2w ago

SCOOP: Top researchers at Columbia, Stanford, and others thought they were elected to elite scientific societies alongside Nobel laureates. The catch? The organizations are a sham. I spent the last month diving deep into a massive academic scam spanning continents, for @nature.com

Exclusive: Sham scientific societies are misleading star researchers

A Nature investigation reveals a network of organizations that have been building their ranks through deceptive practices.

nature.com