Bex 🖤🏴

@thinlyveiledtruth.cryptoanarchy.network

OTG activist in LA, disabled non-binary mom. Anarchist, antifascist always. I defend my community from ICE. Use alt text or I will steal your picture and not give you credit. I’m labeled because of the “mom” word. Sorry.

Social media companies need to be explicitly pressured into not allowing any images of the execution on their services. They have the content recognition systems to block it. If they allow it, it's an abdication of any responsibility to their users. There will be children that see it.

Things got more insane just about as soon as I posted this last night. DHS is now arguing that we cannot even put the names of ICE officers in our lawsuit against those officers. Their position is that, if a defendant works for DHS, they cannot be named in a lawsuit. Never seen anything like it.

All this time, while Defendants have refused to identify Does 4 and 5 or respond to Leo’s discovery requests, the six-month statute of limitations on his FTCA claims has nearly expired. So, on October 6, Leo sought Defendants’ consent to file an amended complaint that (1) adds his FTCA claims against the United States and (2) adds the names of Does 1, 2, and 3. These minimal changes are shown in a redline attached to this filing.
Defendants, however, refused to consent to Leo’s amendments because there is not a protective order in place. One of Defendants’ positions with respect to the protective order is that the “full legal names” of all government employees “should be confidential.” (ECF 109, at 2). That position, apparently, means that Defendants even oppose Leo identifying specific officers in his lawsuit against those very officers based on their misconduct in carrying out their public duties. Because Defendants will not consent to Leo’s amendments, Leo has filed this motion for leave.Justice also requires granting Leo leave to name the Doe officers as defendants. Despite DHS’s remarkable position that all government employees’ names are confidential, parties routinely sue government employees by name. In fact, Rule 10(a) “requires a complaint to ‘include the names of all the parties.’” Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 322 (11th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a)). “Lawsuits are public events.” Id. Rule 10(a) “protects the public’s legitimate interest in knowing all of the facts involved, including the identity of the parties.” Id. Only in an “exceptional case” can a party’s name be withheld from the public. Id. And that bar is even higher for public employees since their employment “diminishes their privacy interests” given “the corresponding public interest in knowing how public employees are performing their jobs.” Stern v. FBI, 737 F.2d 84, 92 (D.C. Cir. 1984);
Jared@jaredmcclain.bsky.social · 2d ago

It's been a struggle for reporters to get DHS to provide the names of officers who violate people's civil rights. Now, in our case against DHS's construction-site raids, the government is arguing in court that its employees names are "confidential" and should not be made public during litigation.

DHS's position on the protective order: "We cannot agree to the striking of this provisions. The phone numbers, physical addresses, full legal names, and email addresses of current and former employees in the federal government ... should be confidential."

There is absolutely no difference between: 1) hiring thousands of ICE agents, pointing them at immigrant communities, and giving them a deportation quota...🤡 And 2) hiring thousands of cops, pointing them at Black communities, and giving them an arrest quota...🤡 It is exactly the same thing.

Mekka Okereke@mekka.mekka-tech.com · last yr.

Classic video. I will never stop sharing this. Do you think Black people want this cop running around their city with a ticket quota and an arrest quota, ruining the lives of Black people for no reason? Or trained and working as a detective, solving homicides, SAs, and returning stolen property?

It's definitely hitting me today that it is the point to traumatize us to the level of incoherence. I know this. It's not a surprise. But holy shit am I feeling it today. Between the ICE surge, the Skid Row Shit Show, and Trump and Hegseth's comments (and now Pentagon announcement)... Dude.

Well, the day we all knew was coming has arrived. We have ICE on video using CA EXEMPT plates. Those plates are only supposed to be used by local agencies (not just LEOs too, but things like DWP). They should have known we'd be watching for that. Way to shatter public trust.

The DSA can't even be assed to at bare minimum hold Mamdani to account for doing shit like letting the NYPD get away with attacking protestors opposed to Netanyahu at the U.N. and are instead applying that punishment to folk taking him to task to that. Absolutely pathetic behavior.