Dmitry Kochetkov

@dkochetkov.bsky.social

Research Assessment & Peer Review Researcher | Scientometrics, STS & Scholarly Communication | CWTS PhD Candidate

Grateful to CWTS communication team for hosting my seminar on the Publish-Review-Curate model during Peer Review Week 2026 #PeerReviewWeek #PeerReview #PublishReviewCurate

CWTS | Leiden University@cwts.nl · 2d ago

📣 New research seminar: Next week, @dkochetkov.bsky.social will give a talk on 'Crossing the Chasm: The PRC Model and the Future of Peer Review' @peerreviewweek.bsky.social 📅 Friday, 18/9/2026 | 3:00-4:15 PM (CEST) 📌 Online & in person at CWTS www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/events/20...

Excited to be part of REALISE - a new Horizon Europe project on research assessment reform (CoARA/ARRA). Working alongside great colleagues at CWTS and across Europe. Follow along! cc: @cwts.nl @coarassessment.bsky.social @dorassessment.bsky.social @scurry.bsky.social @lizziegadd.bsky.social

realise-project.bsky.social@realise-project.bsky.social · 2w ago

👋 Hello and welcome! 👥Meet REALISE - the new #HorizonEurope project, aiming to reform current European and global #ResearchAssessment methods. 🎉Follow us and stay tuned for updates on our work towards more responsible and inclusive research assessment practices.

New paper out: "Peer Review at the Crossroads" I analyzed 4 peer review models from traditional gatekeeping to Publish-Review-Curate. Key finding: no single model is ideal, but PRC shows promise for transparency & accessibility. Open access: doi.org/10.1002/leap... #PeerReview #OpenScience #STS

Peer Review at the Crossroads

Peer review has long been regarded as a cornerstone of scholarly communication, ensuring high quality and credibility of published research. Although academic journals trace their origins back three ...

doi.org

⚖️ Who is best in place to regulate the use of research output for training generative AI systems? In our new post, Dmitry Kochetkov explores this question and shows how generative AI is reshaping copyright and the future of scholarly publishing. Read more 👉 www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/cop...

Copyright, GenAI, and the future of academic publishing

Generative artificial intelligence poses significant challenges to copyright law and the principles of open science. In a new preprint, I study this complex interplay and existing regulatory framework...

leidenmadtrics.nl

🆕 From now on, MetaROR can also include author responses on its submission pages. You will find them underneath the assessment & reviews. Have you already been reviewed on MetaROR & want to provide a response? Please contact your editor. 👇 Two of our submissions now include such a response [1/3]

'Registered Revisions is a policy that activates when peer reviewers request new data or analyses. Instead of ad hoc revisions, authors draft a revision plan which, if approved, grants in-principle acceptance (IPA).' www.cos.io/r3ct/registe... #PeerReview

Impact of Registered Revisions

Publication pre-commitment devices such as Preregistration, Registered Reports, and Registered Revisions may substantially reduce publication biases, prepublication biases (e.g. p-hacking and HARKING)...

cos.io

Intriguing and worth reading even if I find it hard to judge how meaningful is Ben’s Bridging Metric. Very much enjoyed the Hamming quote: “I cannot prove the cause-and-effect relationship; I can only observe the correlation”, which seems to me to apply to a lot of metascience questions! ;-)

Ben Johnson@ersatzben.com · last yr.

What counts as interdisciplinary research? And can we tell who is actually funding it, versus just talking about it? A data-driven deep-dive from me here: open.substack.com/pub/johnsonb...