Dr. Tanja Stratmann

@drtanjastratmann.bsky.social

PhD in Marine Sciences, Deep-Sea Benthic Ecologist and Biogeochemist, #ERC Group Leader at @marumunibremen.bsky.social/ #Postdoc at @utrechtuniversity.bsky.social; scientific illustrations at https://instagram.com/tanjastratmann/

A couple of weeks ago, I had lunch with a colleague from another faculty, with whom I studied. We were talking about the different papers each of us are working on and today, I received a review request for 1 of those papers. Sorry editor, strong conflict of interest (for more than 1 co-author) 🤷‍♀️.

To transport my new costum-built deep-sea in-situ incubation chambers I am looking for transportation or flightcase boxes. I contacted several manufacturers and 1 already sent me a quote. Its manager was likely bored as he googled me before sending the quote, starting with Good day Dr Stratmann. 😂

Few years ago, a former #NIOZ colleague (Philip Riekenberg) introduced me to the concept of writing 100 words each day. I have adopted it and I also asked my new PhD student to do the same. Today, I wrote more words than I did the last 7 d, and I managed to sent the manuscript to the co-authors 💪.

Last Friday, I went out into the field to collect marine sediment and seawater samples to prepare the bacteria 🦠culture that I will enrich in 13C & 15N. Later-on this culture will be fed to sponges and bryozoans in 3 experiments I will conduct until the end of this year. #SPYCLING

I have reached a stage in my career, where writing a paper is actually relaxing, because all the other tasks are mainly keeping a flea circus alive 😬 (including PhD defense of my first PhD student, preparing for field work, research cruises, setting up labs and instrument installation, etc.).

How to check whether a scientist considers herself oveworked: Give her the author's proof of the latest paper and say there is a mismatch between authors in author list and corresponding author. I'm first and corresponding author and my name is spelled ✅. But I asked 2 persons to confirm it. 😬

I'm still reviewing the manuscript and I can only give one advice: If you intend to publish an extremely flawed study and the topic is my research speciality, I recommend to exclude me as a reviewer. Otherwise I will recommend that this extremely flawed study will be rejected.