Dylan McConnell

@dylanjmcconnell.bsky.social

Renewable Energy & Energy Systems Researcher at University of NSW (..but also I live in Melbourne)

Does anyone have favorite references on the interdisciplinarity penalty (people doing interdisciplinary work are underrewarded in their appointing departments, run centers and degrees without resources or dedicated hires, go to double committee meetings, etc.)?

In which I yell at my favorite journal and its thoughtful, talented collection of researchers that we really need to take fossil phase-out seriously as a line of inquiry, and that we would not stand for the level of talking around it as a solution in other settings with very obvious problems:

The state of energy transition research and the need for fossil phase-out: evidence from Environmental Research Letters

The state of energy transition research and the need for fossil phase-out: evidence from Environmental Research Letters, Grubert, Emily

iopscience.iop.org

Spoke to ABC about datacentre things today, alongside Bronwyn Cumbo from UTS Pathologically refuse to listen to myself - so can't really tell you exactly what was said, but tl;dr (should be?) along lines of not great for emissions, prices, energy transition etc www.abc.net.au/listen/progr...

Is it true what they say about data centres? - ABC listen

Continuing our deep dive into data centres, two experts look closely at the energy and environmental issues that concern communities living near proposed data centre sites.  Guests:  Dr Dylan McConn...

abc.net.au

‘Energy skeptics’ in 2016: “This extreme weather event that caused problems in South Australia’s 40% clean grid is PROOF RENEWABLES DON’T WORK.” ‘Energy skeptics’ in 2026: “This extreme weather event that didn’t cause problems in South Australia’s 85% clean grid is PROOF RENEWABLES DON’T WORK.”

Attention fellow energy nerds: we're running an "Open-Source Energy System Modelling Workshop" later this year! Looking for contributors - presentations, demonstrations, tutorials, and open discussion on topics relevant to the open-source energy modelling community .. anything really! 🔌💡

I've put a new piece of analysis out today showing how Shell's Prelude LNG terminal will receive a butt tonne of free offset credits from the safeguard mechanism for no other reason than because it repeatedly exposed its workers from life threatening risk. Really!

1 – Shell’s Prelude liquefied gas facility will receive in the order of $200 million worth of unearned offset credits under the rules of Australia’s Safeguard Mechanism

2 – This unearned bounty is not linked to emissions reduction at the facility. The credits are instead being issued as a direct result of a series of life-threatening safety issues and a workers strike at the facility in the early years of the facility’s operating life.

3 – Prelude is one of Australia’s most emission-intensive liquefied gas producers. Its emissions have risen in recent years and are set to increase even further even while it continues to receive free offset units.

4 – Prelude can use the free and entirely unearned credits it was issued under the current Safeguard Mechanism rules to avoid buying a single offset credit until well into the next decade.