Guy Berger

@econberger.bsky.social

Senior Advisor on Labor Markets at Access/Macro; Workforce Economist in Residence at Guild; Senior Fellow at the Burning Glass Institute. I tweet a lot about labor markets, macro, and (sorry) music! Tweets represent my own views.

The decision to make communication by the Fed Chair more opaque has increased rather than decreased the significance/impact of Fed beat reporters. The quickest way to reduce their significance/impact is for the Chair to speak more explicitly & frequently. You gotta choose!

The decomposition of faster employment growth looked a little odd two months ago - overly "lower layoffs" heavy, with quits moving in the wrong direction. As of June it looks much more conventional, with hiring doing more heavy lifting and quits rising a teeny tiny bit.

Bild

Where does the presumption that “Wall Street” is a loser from Fed opacity come from? The less and more vaguely the Fed communicates, the higher the return to specialized information gathering. Would make more sense to say, “Stop whining about something that will make you rich

Bild

There are people who put too much weight on the ISM employment indices. Some signal in this indicator, but we also have a lot of other data in hand. Goes double for the ISM *manufacturing* employment index, this is such a small share of the US labor market.

Not that this is a good idea, but if you were a central banker who REALLY wanted to extract pure signals about the world out of market price movements, you’d want a very explicit and comprehensive reaction function that you stuck to doggedly

Not a politics guy and I'm not sure my assessment of major legislative activity on health insurance is correct (did I omit anything?), but I don't think it's a coincidence that both Clintoncare (failed) and Obamacare (successful) happened after periods of elevated cost growth

Bild

1/ Some not-great news from the Q2 2026 employment cost index (ECI), for both the Fed and for workers. For the first time in a while, non-wage benefit costs are outgrowing wages. For the Fed that means wage data understate labor-induced inflationary pressures...

Bild

for tomorrow's ECI release, I'll be looking closely at the grey line - are wages starting to understate labor cost pressures? (Alternatively: is faster benefit cost growth eating away at wage growth?)

Bild

My friend @chipcutter.bsky.social has a great article on the 2026 change in hiring sentiment at big companies. But everyone should curb their enthusiasm. Hiring has increased by a measly 1% in the first 5 months of '26 relative to the 2nd half of '25... www.wsj.com/business/big...

Big Companies Are Starting to Hire Again, Defying Predictions of AI Wipeout

After a year of holding back on new hires, companies from tech and transportation to defense now say they need more people to work alongside AI.

wsj.com

Indeed job postings: 1/ Overall postings are flat; not rising, not falling. On a year-over-year basis they're still down a little but we'll cross the X axis in the next few months.

Bild

Claims: 1/ I thought last week's initial claims number (188K) was a freakish fluke. This week: 197K, a little higher but still very low... increases the odds that we've seen a further small decline in layoffs. (Let's give it a few more weeks before big pronouncements.)

Bild