2. Alarmibragging claims from companies should be scrutinized for such things as: What exactly was the training data & other input to the systems? What was system output? >>
ElizabethwithaZ
@elizabethwithaz.bsky.social
Technology, education, and other random thoughts.
Hear me out: Down to the Countryside, but for politicians and AI/crypto tech bros. Like, anyone who argues against a social safety net.
ICYMI — "We need (old/poor) people off of Medicaid & Social Security and back into the workforce."🤔 GEORGIA Republican Congressman Mike Collins ( @ossoff.senate.gov opponent) wants you to work til you die, with fewer benefits, as they cut taxes for the rich and inequality skyrockets.
Imagine if the media took the words of climate scientists as seriously as it does that rando from Anthropic… Air pollution and climate change from fossil fuel use are literally killing millions of people every year, but sure, let’s focus on the idiocy that “AI is going to kill everyone in 10”.
A plane and a boulder are equally flightworthy outside the presence of gravity.
One of the things that also pisses me off is that in a vacuum, this technology is value-neutral. It's development in conjunction with the profit motive is what causes the worst aspect of it to manifest. The problem is not the technology itself, but is and has always been Capitalism.
It's the next day, and I'm still thinking about how insidious the "you are super special and strong and elite because we are abusing you" messaging is. They're taking kids at a really vulnerable time and tying their self-esteem and group identity/belonging to accepting mistreatment from authority.
SPECIAL REPORT Last month, Alpha School invited people to follow student social media accounts "if curious about life in our high schools." I accepted their offer. What I've found shocks me. Forget the AI and ask instead: Is Alpha Schools a cult? Follow along for a summary of my findings.
Coincidentally, I don't think we should be bringing chainsaws into the classroom, either.
Some pro-AI people frame the AI in school debate as "Why would you not allow AI in schools? It's like sticking with an axe when a chainsaw is available." Why this framing is wrong:
It's really hard to teach kids critical thought around tech when you have a multi-trillion dollar industry shoving magical thinking at them all the time. Had a long conversation with a high school student today.
I'm assuming any sort of labor organizing is also an "automatic fail" in this "how to be exploited" challenge.
Another Alpha School boot-camp activity apparently requires students to do unpaid labor cleaning restaurant kitchens or gas-station bathrooms. Students audio record themselves as they do this work, and if they complain, they fail.
Reading the quotes from these children is heartbreaking. They are treated like products to be "optimized", not humans whose growth should be supported. They've been convinced that their value lies in they way they endure contrived hardship or collect points in arbitrary tests. Kids deserve better.
SPECIAL REPORT Last month, Alpha School invited people to follow student social media accounts "if curious about life in our high schools." I accepted their offer. What I've found shocks me. Forget the AI and ask instead: Is Alpha Schools a cult? Follow along for a summary of my findings.
If middle school students can figure this one out, the NYT has no excuse.
Hey @ericlipton.nytimes.com 👋 AI is not “evolving” on its own. *People* are choosing how to build it. *People* are choosing how to train it. *People* are choosing how to run it. Maybe the problem is that they are the *wrong people* to make these choices.
And two dolls max per kid this Christmas. (But yeah, we should actually drive less, for real. Stopped clock and all that.)
Republican 2026 Midterm Slogan: “Drive Less and Drink Less Coffee to ease the pain of Trump’s stupid war and trade war”
But if your reaction is "it's just a tool" or "we just need to own the means of computation", I encourage you to consider the institutions and power around said tool and said computation.
*whispers in analysis of political economy and science and technology studies* Frankly, no. If your technology relies on massive capital consolidation to function at all, then the problem is the technology, not simply who wields it.
**whispers in socialism** The problem isn't the tech, the problem is the system wielding the tech. I think a lot of this debate exposes a lot of folks here as stone cold libs (compliments for some, insults to others) who disagree with the concept that there is no moral consumption under capitalism.
Thanks, I hate it.
Tegmark thought there should be an "alliance" to stop the oh so super intelligent devil kind of "AI" from coming to fruition. Who is in this alliance you say? Well none other than Steve Bannon. Any alliance with him has to be "pro human" right? www.theverge.com/ai-artificia...
Remember the "heartwarming" story about the little girl trying to raise money for her brain story with the lemonade stand? I'm not linking because the kid's picture is in the thumbnail, but it was sold as a "uplifting" story, rather than an indictment of the US health system.
Possibly the most American news of all time
maybe instead of "astra" they should have called it "aspera"
I'm so tired of the advice to hide little white text with secret instructions to chatbots in my assignments. Setting little traps so I can trick and "catch" students is such a grim approach to teaching. Please don't respond with whether this "trick" even works. It's not relevant. 💔
The idea that classrooms are chiefly spaces for product testing, and that it is irresponsible pedagogy not to enforce this, is both cynical and vile, and “fuck off” is a cogent response from any professional educator to any non-teaching salescreep or tech-but-not-subject-matter expert who voices it.
AI apologists to actual disciplinary experts & experienced teachers
What the fuck does this even mean for a History classroom?
"Cheating" is not even the issue for me, per se. It's circumventing learning. It's the message that if you think through a problem yourself, use your own voice, develop your own vision, you are a sucker. These are the biggest dangers of "AI" in the classroom.
Consumption of these "AI" products prevents development of the very skills needed for their critical analysis. If we do not prepare our students to reject the project of "AI", if we do not teach them the critical skills to understand and respond to it, these are the waters in which they will drown.
1. Students are being lied to about the harms of AI, and they ARE cheating, on scales never seen before and brushing past that is not going to hurt them and society is not great. 2. In some fields, banning AI is absolutely fine why are people outside of those fields insisting that we MUST use it?
I think I have to get Dewey’s credo tattooed onto my forehead: “I believe education is a process of living, not a preparation for future living.” Easy-hard is a stupid dimension along which to think about education. Meaningful-meaningless is better. (comment on original text in the black box)
1. Students are being lied to about the harms of AI, and they ARE cheating, on scales never seen before and brushing past that is not going to hurt them and society is not great. 2. In some fields, banning AI is absolutely fine why are people outside of those fields insisting that we MUST use it?
I'm bewildered by this economist's suggestion that half of instructional time should be devoted to teaching students to "use AI". Where does the extra time come from? Even if you thought using these products in classrooms is wise, you need a more thoughtful approach than "Go halfsies!"
What the fuck does this even mean for a History classroom?
There's a good chunk of people who think that software doing unexpected things is a sign of emerging intelligence, not a bug or poor design.
I think it’s cool how “this toaster might electrocute you” or “these brakes don’t always work” is acceptable in consumer products because it’s software.
Charlotte Wainwright restoring and saving old/ancient books. www.wainwrightbookbinding.com
2,000+ signed a petition asking for a pause on AI in BC. The BC Ministry of Education and Childcare took the easy way out and said it's not their responsibility to pause AI use in classrooms. With enough public support and political will, we can make them care. actionnetwork.org/petitions/pa...
Pause on Generative AI in BC Schools
We demand that the Ministry of Education and Child Care enact a two-year pause (moratorium) on AI usage in classrooms in British Columbia. This means that for two years, in schools in BC: - Students...
actionnetwork.org
Wins against GenAI are “win[s] for democracy - for all the teachers and parents and students who said to district leaders that moving fast with ‘AI’ was going to break things, break people; who asked that their needs be met, their voices be heard over the needs and voices of vendors” Audrey Watters
Move Slow, Remake Things
In the prologue to their book Tinkering Toward Utopia, historians David Tyack and Larry Cuban highlight the tensions in how Americans think about schooling: we have, almost since the nation’s outset, ...
2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com
NEW: While everyone focused on NYC's ban on AI in schools, LA also quietly banned AI tools for all students, and DC public schools laid out new restrictions on screen time It's all b/c parents organizing and pushing them to do it. And more cities are going to follow www.nbcnews.com/news/educati...
How parent activists pushed schools to restrict AI and screen time — and won
New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., announced changes this week in response to a growing grassroots movement against technology in schools.
nbcnews.com
Shout out to our school librarian for sending me home this long weekend with a book she thought I might enjoy. One of the best things about this new school year is that I get to work more closely with the librarians. <3 The book:
You Look Like a Thing and I Love You - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This is the "center, reasonable, pragmatic" view right now. Replace "AI tools" with anything else, and it's obvious that it's cult-level nonsense. (From "AI with Intention" by an eduinfluencer)