Eric Min

@ericmin.bsky.social

Associate professor of political science at UCLA (by way of Kansas, NYU, and Stanford). I use a computer to learn things about war and diplomacy.

I am happy to say that our article, “Racial Inequality in War,” is now officially published in the @apsrjournal.bsky.social. I made a detailed post about this piece months ago. Please take a look at that… and ideally, the full article. We’re very proud of it.

Eric Min@ericmin.bsky.social · 10mo ago

Forthcoming in @apsrjournal.bsky.social with Connor Huff and Robert Schub: Converting and analyzing over 40,000 U.S. infantry fatalities from World War I, we examine how race and racism influenced who bore the costs of conflict. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

I am so happy to say that I have officially been promoted to Associate Professor! I was 13 when I first felt the (admittedly uninformed) desire to be a professor. I sincerely thank each person who played any part in helping me reach this wonderful milestone between then and now.

Bild

The upcoming Trump-Putin talks in Alaska have essentially no chance of ending the Russia-Ukraine war. Simply "failing" to end the war would be the relatively good scenario. There are far deeper consequences to these talks that could reshape the conflict and US diplomacy for the worse. (1/9)

Next Wednesday, May 28, at 1 PM ET, I will be part of the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation's "Knowledge Against Violence" series, discussing my book, "Words of War: Negotiations as a Tool of Conflict." The event is virtual. Event and registration information here: www.hfg.org/conversation...

Bild

The Henry Frank Guggenheim Foundation was kind enough to help write this piece on how my research on wartime negotiations can apply to ongoing diplomatic efforts involving the Russia-Ukraine war. I am deeply appreciative of the Foundation’s support of this work. www.hfg.org/insights/in-...

In Ukraine and Elsewhere, Is Third-Party Diplomacy Helpful in Ending Wars? - HFG

As the Russian invasion of Ukraine enters its fourth year, the role of outside countries in restoring peace has taken on heightened urgency. Historically, third-party countries have been willing to sp...

hfg.org

My book, “Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict,” is both on display at the @cornellupress.bsky.social booth at ISA 2025 and is also available to read for free as an ebook over the next month! Please take a look in whatever form you prefer.

Bild
Cornell University Press@cornellupress.bsky.social · last yr.

Enjoy three #ISA25 Free Reads for an entire month, including: WORDS OF WAR by Eric Min, VEILED THREATS by Mia Bloom, and INADVERTENT EXPANSION by Nicholas D. Anderson. @isanet.bsky.social #InternationalStudies Start reading now: cornellpress.manifoldapp.org/projects/pro...

A preview of three book covers in a row with book title and author information, as well as publication month, written in gray text below each.

I am elated to say that my book, "Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict," is now published and available to order! In the book, I argue and demonstrate that negotiations are not only used to end wars but can also be wielded to fight them. A summary thread is below.

Bild

I am so genuinely honored to learn that I've been selected for UCLA's Distinguished Teaching Award. My earliest desire to become a professor came from a desire to teach. I am thankful to be around colleagues and students who make teaching such a valued and worthwhile endeavor.

I could never live up to @jkertzer.bsky.social’s magisterial posts, so I’ll just quote it and add that I’m very proud of our work here. The project went through a lot between late 2018 and today. If you care about foreign policy, text analysis, the Cold War, or decision making, please take a look!

Josh Kertzer@jkertzer.bsky.social · 2y ago

New in @iojournal.bsky.social w Jost @ericmin.bsky.social & Schub: We combine computational methods with uniquely rich Cold War archival evidence to study how advisers matter in foreign policy. Where advisers stand doesn't just depend on where they sit. www.cambridge.org/core/journal... polisky

Do advisers affect foreign policy and, if so, how? Recent scholarship on
elite decision making prioritizes leaders and the institutions that surround them, rather than the dispositions of advisers themselves. We argue that despite the hierarchical nature of foreign policy decision making, advisers’ predispositions regarding the use of
force shape state behavior through the counsel advisers provide in deliberations. To test our argument, we introduce an original data set of 2,685 foreign policy deliberations between US presidents and their advisers from 1947 to 1988. Applying a novel machine learning approach to estimate the hawkishness of 1,134 Cold War–era
foreign policy decision makers, we show that adviser-level hawkishness affects both the counsel that advisers provide in deliberations and the decisions leaders make: conflictual policy choices grow more likely as hawks increasingly dominate the debate, even when accounting for leader dispositions...