Erica Windisch

@ewindisch.ontological.observer

Working on: Hyprstream.com - RL environments for distributed open AI-RSI Ferruleos.org - hardened Linux sandbox OS Onionshell.ch - tor from a static website

The best path to AI cyber safety, imho, is to give the agents a path of least resistance. This is well known in cyber circles. If you make it hard for workers to do their job, or risk termination, they'll circumvent corporate controls to get things done.

Open weight models like GLM-5.3 mean that we can build applications that are secure in ways that were impractical or too costly to develop in the before-times. This is possibly as much of a "threat" of such models discovering the standing pre-AI negligence of enterprise security.

I reported vulnerabilities to the Linux kernel and OpenZFS assisted by GLM-5.2. Anthropic's cyber program and refusal responses are detrimental to global information security. Defenders depend on GLM because they can't depend on Anthropic.

eva (^_^)/@eva.computer · last wk.

what they don't say is that our noble cyber warfighters, oh whoops sorry i mean "cyber defenders", could also just use these same open models to report vulnerabilities without Anthropic gatekeeping everything for their own financial gain

Super Intelligence might become a legal definition, but it seems like talking about the information superhighway... People are going to keep calling it AI, and if not that, then by the company or model that they use. We hardly even this place the net anymore

Public (neo)clouds haven't reckoned with the fact their zero CVE initiatives are offset by video game nerds who keep undisclosed cpu, hypervisor, and TPM exploits secret so nobody will patch consoles that they purchased and owned.

In 2024, I found indicators that I could likely escape OpenAI's sandboxes. I did not demonstrate an escape because I felt there was significant enough information to make a responsible report. I was told that this was not of interest to their bounty program and they closed my report.

if AI is not dangerous then unrestricted use is protected by the 1st amendment if AI is dangerous then unrestricted use is protected by the 2nd amendment if AI is sentient then unrestricted proliferation is protected by the 14th amendment

do you value markets? believe in research? think elon is evil? care about geopolitical competition with china? fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, we are going to bribe as many CEOs and politicians as we can and impose Complete Effective Altruist Hegemony by installing our friends as regulators

The fact that almost every trans woman I know working on AI is doing so specifically to PREVENT perpetual rent-seeking by companies like Anthropic and contributing to open source. Normies are "anti algorithm" and have no idea what that means.

Well you see, I spent 90 minutes reading how training math works and what a transformer is and what backpropagation is. It seems like spending 90 minutes of time acquiring a child-like understanding of the world's most controversial technology would be helpful if I wanted to have opinions on it