Pablo Ezequiel Flores Kanter

@ezequielfk.bsky.social

PhD in Psychology | MSc in Neuroscience & Bioethics | Researcher, Data Scientist, and Methodological Consultant. I work at the intersection of Data Science, Psychometrics, Bioethics, and Open Science.

Jolana Samii’s research focuses on psychological & behavioral factors that influence health & wellbeing, including sleep quality. Her connected research record links a preregistered plan, data, & a preprint so the work can be followed from question to findings. Read our Q&A:

Lifecycle Open Science in Action: Researcher Q&A with Jolana Samii

Jolana Samii discusses the value of preregistration; how keeping plans, outputs, and outcomes linked and discoverable strengthens the research record; and benefits of making research publicly accessible.

cos.io

If you're struggling today this resource may bring comfort - or more practical suggestions for action. (It's aimed more at those working in education, development and health but has useful tips and links for all. Due another update, so feedback welcome). theresearchcompanion.com/supporting-i...

Supporting each other through difficult and challenging times - The Research Companion

Science, healthcare and education are threatened worldwide. Here are some starter ideas for ways to work together to share and save vital information. And to care for one another.

theresearchcompanion.com

The first time a serious journal asks me to review a paper that is completely written by AI. How do we deal with this? Is it fair to write 'this is either written by AI, or mirrors it's lack of original content'? How do I deal with the 1% probability a human wrote it anyway?

🗞️ @chronicle.com covered findings from the large-scale SCORE effort, which evaluated reproducibility, replicability, and robustness across the social and behavioral sciences. The piece also features researchers weighing in on what the results may mean for the field: www.chronicle.com/article/lots...

Lots of Social Science Didn’t Replicate. Does That Mean It’s Bunk?

Scholars are debating the results of an effort to assess hundreds of papers’ credibility. Where some see failure and cause for urgent reform, others see reason for hope.

chronicle.com