Matheus Gadelha

@gadelha.bsky.social

Research Scientist at Adobe Research. ML/3D/Graphics. http://mgadelha.me

Obviously this doesn't scale, but I chose to send this junior researcher a (hopefully polite) email with some of my thoughts (written hastily in 30 minutes, not polished). More practicing mathematicians & researchers should advocate for the culture they want, so here's my bit.

Bild
Gautam Kamath@gautamkamath.com · 4w ago

I saw someone post a dozen+ AI slop papers purporting to solve niche open problems. This is antisocial behaviour and worse than if the problems stayed open. 0 people understand the solution, and there is no readable writeup. Also, incentive for either is removed.

Rebuttals and discussions need to be reduced an extreme minimal length. CVPR style, 1 single PDF page. No discussion. Else, human ACs and reviewers will have a disadvantage compared to the world of agents out there now.

We appreciate the love ❤️ But limited engagement and few followers on Bsky makes some (not us!) question whether it's worth it Be sure to follow (and share with your ML friends!) if you want to see more updates from ICML!

Marc Lanctot@sharky6000.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Wow, awesome! Massive thank you to the comms & PR team @icmlconf.bsky.social 🤩 ✅️ Multiple update posts per day ✅️ Posts with photos!! 📷 ✅️ Great use of hash tags #icml2026 ✅️ Schedule and QR links at the local mall ✅️ Setting the gold standard for academic Bluesky 👍 🙏

Text-to-image models are remarkable at generation, but they end up deciding on their own what goes where. If you need specific subjects in a specific arrangement, you are left writing prompts and sampling until something usable appears. SIGMA-Gen, our new ICLR 2026 paper, tries to change that.

Bild

Great resource! This is specially important for people starting their research careers. Getting to know different research communities is really important! Technical insight is crucial, but science is ultimately a social endeavor -- understanding and communicating to your peers is key.

Tzu-Mao Li@tzumaoli.bsky.social · 8mo ago

cseweb.ucsd.edu/~tzli/novelt... I gave an internal talk at UCSD last year regarding "novelty" in computer science research. In it I "debunked" some of the myth people seem to have about what is good research in computer science these days. People seemed to like it, so I thought I should share.

As we in the US gather with our families this weekend, it's a good time to consider the ways that technology brings us together—but also keeps us apart. In this blog post, I tell a story about how technology may have tended to increase social isolation. aaronhertzmann.com/2025/10/26/i...

Technology and Social Isolation: From Cars to “AI”

In this blog post, I tell a story of how some technologies from the past century or so have, overall, led to increased social isolation in the United States, as we replaced in-person social interactio...

aaronhertzmann.com

I understand the sentiment, but it is important for people to know that is currently does not reflect reviewer guidelines at CVPR: cvpr.thecvf.com/Conferences/... “(…) you should include specific feedback on ways the authors can improve their papers.”

2025 Reviewer Guidelines

cvpr.thecvf.com

Dima Damen @ECCV 2026@dimadamen.bsky.social · 2y ago

Lessons from SAC @cvprconference.bsky.social Reviewers &AC role is *not* to teach authors how to do research better. Keep the advice about how the work could be differently done or written to yourself &your group. The reviewers role is *only* to assess the scientific correctness of the paper.

#CVPR2025 Is there any way in OpenReview to "mention" a reviewer in a discussion? I think reviewers get the e-mail with whatever message gets posted in the discussion that is sent to them, but they have no idea if Reviewer HjKl is them or someone else...