Tessera
Folgen

GhileneH

@ghilene.bsky.social

Papa et prof. Sciences du langage et socio. Langues romanes et sémitiques. (Here for the knowledge - No need for you to follow back.)

1125 Posts244 Follower382 Folgt
GhileneH@ghilene.bsky.social · 2w ago

Prof. Sabrina Inowlocki @sabrinainowlocki.bsky.social , "Ancient Apologetics and the Bibliographic Imagination" (Cambridge UP, 2026) on @newbooksnetwork.bsky.social via Podbean, check it out! www.podbean.com/ea/dir-h3h56...

Sabrina Inowlocki, "Ancient Apologetics and the Bibliographic Imagination" (Cambridge UP, 2026)

Ancient apologetics is usually treated as a literary genre or a branch of early theology. This Element offers a different account. It argues that many Jewish and Christian texts conventionally labeled...

podbean.com

Erin Michaels@erin-michaels.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Incredibly honored to share that my book, "Test, Measure, Punish," has been awarded the 2026 Pierre Bourdieu Best Book Award by the Sociology of Education Section of the American Sociological Association!

De Gruyter Brill Ancient Studies@dgb-ancientstudies.bsky.social · 3mo ago

📯 The first volume of the Concise Dictionary of Medieval Vernacular Greek (1100–1669) is now online! This work is the English translation and concise version of Kriaras’ Dictionary of Medieval Greek Vernacular Literature (1100–1669), a landmark in Greek lexicography and historical linguistics.

Bild
Presses universitaires de Rennes@editionspur.bsky.social · 3mo ago

📚 Nouveautés des PUR Cinq ouvrages en SHS croisent histoire, art, santé, archéologie et sciences sociales. 🔥 Mort aux rats ! — F. Ploux Révolte de cabaretiers contre les taxes sur le vin (1814). 🎨 Lieu de l’art — dir. A. Battiston & N. Prihodko Relations entre œuvres et espaces d’exposition.

BildBildBild
Katherine Brown@katherine-brown.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Over the past year, @biologyopen.bsky.social has expanded its Fast & Fair initiative to accelerate peer review. The results are impressive - take a look at their latest preprint to find out more: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.org

Daniel Gorelick@danielgorelick.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Paying peer reviewers works. Expanded Fast & Fair experiment @biologyopen.bsky.social: • 5.5 vs 37.7 working days to decision with reviews • ~3 vs ~9 reviewer invitations per manuscript • no reduction in editor-assessed review quality • similar acceptance rates www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Scatter plot showing that Fast & Fair peer review reached first decision with reviews much faster than conventional peer review: mean 5.5 versus 37.7 working days. Most Fast & Fair manuscripts met the 7-working-day target, while conventional manuscripts were slower and more variable, up to 116 working days.