Brad

@inbradtaste.bsky.social

Legal writing professor @depaullaw.bsky.social and erstwhile appellate public defender.

This Thursday (9/24), the Illinois Supreme Court is set to issue its decision on the constitutionality (under Bruen) of our felon-in-possession ban. The case is People v. Benson, No. 131191. Briefs can be found on the ILSC's March 2026 docket page: www.illinoiscourts.gov/courts/supre...

Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts

Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts contains Supreme, Appellate and Circuit Court information, including judges, and the opinions of the Supreme and Appellate Courts.

illinoiscourts.gov

The search for AI ROI continues. University admin gave a presentation to faculty senate on AI. They begged us to discover use cases for them. All they have is a bespoke Ai tutoring agent and hopes and dreams for improved internal operations All senate had to offer was complaints about cheating

This is the part of the opinion that was noteworthy (derogatory) to me too, re: two trends in legal thinking about AI evident here that I find odd. (1) Treating AI as something inevitable that is happening *to( us rather than something we control both literally and in scope of adoption.

Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof@evanbernick.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I just want to highlight these two paragraphs for everyone's consideration. Apologies, but I can't grab the ALT text. In short, the judge welcomes the use of AI to prepare filings, says it's here to stay, and says that he uses AI himself, subject to "independent judgment and verification."

Second major AI sanctions case out of the Illinois Appellate Court with the First District now joining the Fourth in imposing monetary sanctions (here $1500 per citation) with an ARDC referral. The analysis is worth the read, especially for Illinois lawyers. tinyurl.com/zxam2a7x