Matt

@itsmattagain.bsky.social

Twitter emigrant and irritant

Polanski really needs to get a grip and a sense of political nowse because what the fuck is this. Stop wading into arguments that paint you and the party unfavorably. Give your head a wobble. He, and far too many other greens, have no idea when to not be fucking stupid.

Bild

“Judge me by my actions” you say. Very well. The EHRC has converted statutory interpretation into prescriptive exclusion, declaring trans inclusion “very likely” unlawful although the Court ordered no blanket exclusion and expressly disclaimed policymaking. That is regulatory overreach.

Equality and Human Rights Commission@equalityhumanright.bsky.social · 13h ago

Our code of practice for services, public functions and associations comes into force today. It provides practical guidance on how the Equality Act 2010 applies to services, public functions and associations. Find out more: https://ow.ly/alIf50Zwrkx

Quote from Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson: 'At the EHRC we want a society where everyone’s rights are respected and realised, so that we can all live well together. Our statutory guidance will help services across the country comply with the Equality Act, protecting service users from discrimination and harassment while reducing the risk of the provider being subject to litigation. 



As Britain’s equality regulator, our work doesn’t end upon publication of this guidance. We monitor compliance with the law and take enforcement action where proportionate and necessary, in line with our well-established regulatory model and decision-making framework.'

where i have less sympathy is politicians *whose job it is to go over this stuff*—many seem to have also passively absorbed this idea this was small clarification, balancing of rights

i've found many cis people either: ▪️ don't know anything about this at all ▪️ or imagine it *allows* service providers to be trans-exclusionary, rather than *mandates* that & are only now catching up

Elizabeth Taylor@elizabethtaylor47.bsky.social · 11h ago

This is what we need to hear more of. And we need to forgive people when they say this. Better late than never - we need more people to speak up and speak louder however late they join the fight.

when the revised code dropped a lot of lab mps where like "wait, how do services be trans inclusive if they want to?" &, like, they can't. that's the whole point this is what we've been trying to tell you for almost 2 years & you've been blithely ignoring us

I'd like my tablet to last more than two years, or a washing machine that doesn't break after five. I'd like shoes with soles that don't wear flat within 6 months, and clothes with stitching that doesn't come undone. None of these are cheap things. The mid price things don't last as they should.

Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social · 2d ago

It’s more economical to buy cheap things that last five years than super expensive things that last decades! It just is! The reality is I’M not going to last forever, I don’t really need my appliances to greatly outlive me

I hate boomers who say "if you want something then you should have to work for it. I wasn't given anything for free". Your house cost the equivalent of a KitKat. Your pension rises faster than the wages we actually do work for. Just shut the fuck up. The ignorance and entitlement is staggering.

The far right have started calling Manchester Mincechester because our mayor is a lesbian. They really can't make their minds up about cities. Surely they cannot be dangerous crime ridden Sharia law hotspots AND pits of homosexuality degeneracy at the same time. Pick a fucking conspiracy theory.

He's gone for Pratchett. Thats enough. Ive defended Stancil but this time he's gone too far. (And no, no one thinks the boots theory is a fully worked out economic system: its a elegant metaphor for part of the problem)

Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social · yesterday

Yeah, for days people have been citing “boots theory” at me and I want to shout DO YOU REALIZE THIS IS A RANDOM IDEA TOSSED OUT BY A FANTASY WRITER AND MAY NOT ACCURATELY DESCRIBE REALITY

your restaurants are nicer, people aged 30-50 look unfathomably better, cities are infinitely safer and usually have much nicer public realms, popular entertainment is close to infinitely limitless for a small monthly fee and usually has a much higher baseline quality than the average of those ages

Meta takes a week to decide that obvious Antisemitism is in fact absolutely fine on their platform. Staggering. I wish the conversation about Antisemitism focussed on the intense Antisemitism of the right and of tech companies.

Bild

Cities dismantled their tram networks to become “motor cities of the future”. The result? You could travel further within 30 mins via public transport in 1957 than you can in 2026. Cities are seeking billions to rebuild networks. Incredible piece of work this.

The Exchange@theexchangeleeds.bsky.social · 2w ago

If you stood on Briggate at 8am on a weekday in 1957, and stood there again in 2026, in which year could you reach more of the city in half an hour? Samuel Bancroft has crunched the numbers. Since the 1950s, Leeds has got bigger - but the city has effectively shrunk.

I've had a bad fortnight for expensive things breaking, not to the point of unusability but to the point of needing replacing. This always happens right when you should be saving money 😭

But I didn’t want Cadburys to taste like shite, that’s been imposed on me. Mondolez made $2.4 billion last year they could have swallowed some of the higher cocoa costs, but didn’t, and more importantly, now costs are lower, they won’t reinstate the quality will they?

Max Dubler 🏳️‍🌈@maxdubler.com · 3d ago

I think my most genuinely unpopular take is that a widely held and genuine consumer preference for cheaper, lower-quality goods, not private equity, is driving the decline in quality of consumer goods like clothing and housewares.