Jack 🦠

@jack-d-barber.bsky.social

🧬 PhD student in Aberdeen 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🦠 Linking antimicrobial resistance and structural inequality 💊 (he/they) 💖💜💙 Deprivation, migrant health, env inequality + AMR 🤝

AMR impacts migrants but only 4/4039 studies on interventions found. Gaps: poor migrant data📉, hospital-focused🏥, limited outcomes🔬. More equity-driven, community-based research needed.

Interventions to address antimicrobial resistance in migrants: a systematic review

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat that disproportionately affects structurally marginalized groups, including migrants. Yet migrants are largely absent from AMR surveillance systems and response strategies, creating health inequities and undermining global containment efforts. This systematic review examines the evidence base for interventions targeting AMR in migrant populations, with three objectives to summarize existing research; to identify gaps in data collection, intervention design and outcome measurement; and to propose a path towards more equitable, migrant-inclusive AMR responses.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed (January 2000−December 2025), following PRISMA guidelines using terms related to migration, AMR and interventions. Tuberculosis studies were excluded and we prioritized interventions addressing WHO Critical and High-Priority pathogens.ResultsOf 4039 records screened, only four studies met inclusion criteria, therefore we performed a narrative synthesis.DiscussionAcross these studies we identified three persistent gaps: (i) surveillance and monitoring rarely stratified data by migration status, ethnicity or country of origin; (ii) interventions were almost exclusively hospital-based, with little attention to community settings or care pathways; and (iii) outcome measurement was limited, with a narrow focus on microbiological endpoints and few robust clinical or equity-sensitive outcomes. Current evidence on AMR interventions for migrants is scarce, fragmented and insufficient to guide policy. Future work should prioritize high-quality, disaggregated surveillance data, contextually appropriate study designs and community-based care models, enabling rigorous, equity-driven evaluation of interventions.

academic.oup.com

I describe it as such as a historian of disability because I want to remind scientists and the world that the history of science IS the history of eugenics, scientific racism and medical racism, and more. I’m not comforting them with the idea that it was a ‘pseudoscience.’ This is your history.

mataliandy@mataliandy.com · 5mo ago

It's not "race science" it's "unfounded racist scientific-sounding claims promoted by racists." I hate that eugenics is being described as a "science," even by journalists who are against it. WTF?

The same Democratic Party insisting that we can "fix" ICE by giving it more years of billions of dollars believes we can "fix" the cops, the fossil fuel industry, and the utility industry the same way. It's all the same logic that protects them while killing us.