Jennifer Clark

@jclarkcrp.bsky.social

Professor. Regional economic development; industrial restructuring; cities + tech; economic geography. Editor-in-Chief @regionalstudies.bsky.social. Also, dogs, birds, community. 🏙️

Agreed! But it is not just US higher ed that excels because of the intricate and interconnected national innovation system built over the last century, it is the US economy as a whole that excels. Dismantling the US national innovation system is an epic own goal. Colossally stupid.

AAUP@aaup.org · 2w ago

US research excels because generations of scientists have been free to pursue difficult questions, challenge conventional wisdom, and publish findings without political interference. The Trump admin wants to change that. @afthighered.bsky.social Full statement: www.aaup.org/news/aaup-af...

Government shouldn't be trying to make it harder for eligible voters to participate in elections, but that's just what would happen in the SAVE America Act were allowed to pass. Enough. Call the Capital Switchboard today at 202-224-3121 to tell Senators Husted and Moreno to vote NO on Act.

Noting @justsecurity.org's “Zero Evidence”: How Judges and Grand Juries Have Rejected the Trump Administration Efforts to Investigate and Prosecute” a running list of the gap bet. what they say & what they can do as DOJ withdraws subpoenas aimed at NYT reporters today. Don’t obey in advance.

Ryan Goodman@rgoodlaw.bsky.social · 2w ago

3/ Adds to an accumulation of subpoenas withdrawn, rejected by judges and more. We've kept count of them all here: www.justsecurity.org/146665/court...

OUT TODAY, the AAUP just released the first comprehensive account of how the Trump administration has taken the same playbook it's used on law firms & foreign governments & turned it on American universities. US higher ed has, in effect, become a target of a massive extortion racket. 🧵

New Report on Extorted Compliance Charges “Massive Extortion Racket” Against Higher Ed

A new AAUP report, "Extorted Compliance: A Threat to Institutional Autonomy, Academic Freedom, and Shared Governance," exposes how the Trump administration has extended its pay-to-play approach to gov...

aaup.org

What a great article not only on faculty workloads, but how little our salaries actually factor in to most university budgets. A few highlights. First, our salaries are falling:

Third, faculty salaries are falling even if we statistically control for faculty rank and institution. By our analysis of National Center for Education Statistics data, tenured and tenure-track salaries are down 10 percent in real terms since 2016 and are lower today than they were in 2002; nontenured faculty salaries are down 4 percent since 2016 and are at 2002 levels today.

To put this plainly: Suppose sharply increased teaching loads enabled institutions to cut one out of every seven full-time faculty. (That’s roughly what we saw last year in severe cuts announced at West Virginia, Western Illinois, and St. Cloud State Universities.) The associated savings in salary and benefits even through such drastic action would amount to less than 2.5 percent of total institutional expenditures for the typical university.

The upshot? If you think higher education has a cost problem, squeezing more teaching out of faculty is not the first place you should look.

Maxims from architectural history that are spot on comments about right wing classicism, ca. 2026: Eugène Viollet-le-Duc: In architecture, there are two necessary ways of being true. It must be true according to the program and true according to the methods of construction.

An nearly blank arch with square nipples dozes in front of a ferris wheel. Two gilded vultures flank what may be the angel of history at the top of the arch.

Governor DeWine has vetoed HB 472, the very bad bill that would have made it much harder to vote by mail for many Ohioans and would have introduced new identity fraud and privacy concerns for voters. Thank you for listening to election officials and everyday Ohioans, Governor DeWine!

Bild

When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute women’s work to hallucinated male scholars.