Josh Donovan

@jmaydonovan.bsky.social

Middle East historian (modern Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, and its diasporas) | history teacher | one of three Joshes 👬🐶🏳️‍🌈

Sad to hear about the passing of Prof. John Esposito. His work profoundly shaped my own intellectual trajectory. He was a pioneering scholar of the Islamic world, who paired rigorous scholarly analysis with empathy and a solid moral compass pointed at promoting peace, tolerance, and human rights 🕊

I attended & asked what the AHA can/should do to help Mideast historians navigate growing threats to their academic freedom. Rather than address my question, the moderator ended the event early! The refusal of @historians.org to listen to, much less advocate for us is why we need new leadership.

Bild
American Historical Association@historians.org · last mo.

Today at 12:30 ET: Advocacy 101 Training Workshop Join our free online workshop introducing the fundamentals of federal advocacy, from communicating with policymakers to building relationships with congressional offices. Register now.

Excited for both of these new books, which will reshape how historians think about the post-Ottoman Middle East. I'm selfishly grateful to them both for publishing before I finished my own book proposal. I'm eager to think through and build on their brilliant insights!

BildBild

I will point out that MESA, MERIP, and several other academic associations and non-profits are c3 orgs and have no problem speaking up for academic freedom when it comes to Palestine. If you’re afraid of your status for joining us, that’s a skill issue, as the kids say.

Stacy Fahrenthold@sfahrenthold.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Powerful statement calling out the AHA exec committee's unethical electioneering. "We do not agree the AHA needs to be more cautious since it was created by an act of Congress. If anything, that means the AHA has a greater responsibility to speak out." 💯 www.historiansforpeace.org/2026/05/29/h...

Screenshot of the final paragraph of HPAD's statement from May 29, 2026, linked in this posted. This passage is highlighted: "Finally, we believe that advocating for our profession and denouncing scholasticide in Gaza carried out with our tax dollars are entirely compatible. We do not agree that the AHA needs to be more cautious since it was created by an act of Congress. If anything, that means the AHA has a greater responsibility to speak out.The Executive Committee’s letter to the members violated ethical and professional norms and constitutes elections interference. We endorse its call to members to “carefully examine your ballot with the context provided above in mind.”  As of June 1, you, the members will have a say, and we hope you will support the Democracy Slate of highly-qualified scholars committed to the AHA as an organization that represents all historians, including those who work on the Middle East and oppose scholasticide in Gaza."

So do you think the @historians.org director wrote that email today or was it AHA's shady Thorn Run Partners consultants who did it for them? It's shameful for a scholarly society to scold its members for using the democratic instruments in the bylaw, and to dictate to its members who to vote for.