Jacqueline Beatty, Ph.D.

@jmbeatty.bsky.social

History prof & author of *In Dependence* (NYU Press). Runner; baker; list maker. Never met a cheese I didn’t like. I should be writing. Views mine.

I really need people to understand that being shitty to women is not separate from a person's politics. Contempt for those seen as weaker, resentment towards people who get something you think you're entitled to, using power to dominate or intimidate—these are the foundations of someone's"politics."

let this be a lesson to deal with your feelings of gender anxiety and masculine inadequacy with a hobby or therapy or something and not a high stakes senate election

"It is now de rigueur for federal judges to 'do history' via originialsm or textualism. But the craft of history involves years of reading and immersing oneself in the secondary and primary literature, which a law degree doesn’t train for and the haste of writing an opinion does not allow."

Anna O. Law@unlawfulentries.bsky.social · 2mo ago

This is my lane. I went through the 194 Trump v Barbara opinion from yesterday section by section, noting what they got right about US migration and citizenship history, and what the dissents get wrong. Please share if you think it is helpful to others.

Wrote a little thing about why expanding the number of justices is a time honored tradition* that used to facilitate the Supreme Court’s legitimacy for @inquirer.com (gift link!) *not sure about this headline, though—folks often used “court packing” as an epithet even in the 19th c.

Supreme Court “packing” isn’t radical. It has deep roots in American legal tradition.

In the 19th century, Americans expected Supreme Court justices to represent and even travel around circuits and engage with citizens. Staying in D.C. is a more recent development.

share.inquirer.com

I say it again and again: Because we don’t learn the real history of this country, we do not understand what this country is capable of. After 1870, 22 Black men served in Congress. By 1901, because of racist SCOTUS rulings, electoral coups and election cheating and violence, there were none.

Agree; it’s heartening to see @inquirer.com meeting the moment while serving the best city in the world. I’m really excited to share that Made by History is partnering with @inquirer.com & will be publishing again soon. Historians, pitch us at madebyhistory@inquirer.com.

Jared Cram@jscram3254.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Proof again that who owns the media matters. The @inquirer.com is one of the few major American papers meeting the moment. They don’t shy away from being honest about what Trump is doing and how unhinged he is. share.inquirer.com/oTwgKn

“The Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Budget proposes to eliminate the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and provides $38 million to conduct an orderly shutdown of the Agency.” — NEH.gov The NEH has $207 million for FY2026. War in Iran? 1 billion per day. We go through 4.83 NEHs a day for what?

I don't see this said enough: the widespread use of generative AI is not only making our jobs as educators harder logistically, but also emotionally. It is genuinely sad to be suspicious of students when you have spent so much time building a pedagogy based on trust and not being a cop. It sucks.

My book, *In Dependence*, is newly out in paperback, and @nyupress.bsky.social is celebrating Women's History Month by offering 30% off related titles. That means you can snag a copy for only $21! (use code HOLIDAY at checkout) nyupress.org/978147984231...

In Dependence

Examines the role of the American Revolution in the everyday lives of womenPatriarchal forces of law, finance, and social custom restricted women’s rights ...

nyupress.org