John Alty

@johnalty1.bsky.social

Ex - UK Civil servant; now at LSE; Trustee Director at Chartered Institute of Export; Competition Appeals Tribunal; NED at Trade Remedies Authority; adviser to Pagefield. Mostly trade and competition. And Liverpool FC.

I’m cautious about signing up to too much where the UK commits to follow future EU changes without any say (aka dynamic alignment). But if Parliament agrees to dynamic alignment in certain areas, it makes no sense to require primary legislation for every subsequent change.

I see that the EU supported China in arguing that the US Inflation Reduction Act breached WTO rules, with which unsurprisingly the WTO panel agreed. How does that square with Buy European restrictions I wonder ?

Would you say that a speech one of whose main points was misleading was brilliant ? I agree with Martin Wolf @financialtimes.com that Mark Carney’s comparison of Communism and the rules based system was misleading (“The reality of a world after rupture”). That seems a pretty major flaw in the speech

“The dangerous triumph of neo-mercantilism” great article by Martin Wolf @financialtimes.com. Most politicians are instinctively neomercantilist: they laud exports and decry imports. But many also see that better living standards require economic change. That’s the case for liberalism.

Bild

It’s bad enough that @gideonrachman.bsky.social ‘s articles @FT are always wholly predictable. But he’s stretched the elastic even further by suggesting that Trump’s tariffs should “prompt Keir Starmer to rejoin the single market.” What, tomorrow ? How about the EU just drop its barriers instead ?

It looks like we can stop talking about China’s surplus of over $1trn. That is goods alone. China is likely to run a deficit of more than $200bn in services. None of that avoids the challenges posed by China’s approach on trade but it is misleading that the media only focus on goods.

The Theresa May EU deal (which Labour opposed) had: - alignment on industrial goods regulation - freedom to diverge on services - a non CU common tariff (“magical thinking”) Ironically it looks like we are trying to go back to exactly that.

Bild

Repeat after me: “there is no such thing as ‘a’ customs union with the EU. There is only membership of ‘the’ EU Customs Union.” In the sense that any country with ‘a’ CU (only Turkey btw) simply follows the rules set by EU member states. Better to join the EU @wesstreeting.bsky.social