Josh Westerling

@joshwesterling.bsky.social

Politics, campaigns, and public affairs at JRF - working on communities and place, and the labour market. Current home Bethnal Green, from Wycombe. West Ham ST holder. Views mine.

For me, what was compelling about Burnham's approach in Greater Manchester was on display the day Josh Simons stepped down - whilst Burnham could not be in the room, the people and organisations he put trust in kept things going. It was a demonstrably different way of doing politics.

Bild

A short 🧵on digital content and attention. Yday No.10 was getting stick on X for this 'then and now' video showing the PM and some of the cabinet as children and now in their current position. The kickback was overblown but it does tell you a couple things.

Bild

Over the summer Burnham needs to practice an attentional politics and visibly show he stands against vested interests and will take the fight to them. That + his ability to connect with ordinary people needs to be played up as much as poss. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

Burnham too influenced by ‘vested interests’ to offer change, Polanski says

Exclusive: Green party launches pushback against idea that next PM will have more left-leaning agenda than Starmer

theguardian.com

This could be good if done right. Got to be comfortable with risk and not overly stage manage it. Rather than broadcast at people, it should be Andy in conversation with the people, listening and responding to them. Should be a series of long form content to accompany it which can then be clipped.

Burnham plans summer tour of UK to win over voters in Labour ‘danger zones’

Exclusive: Prospective PM wants to give the country a hopeful message, in contrast with Starmer’s early missteps

theguardian.com

I do think this piece is vindicated as a political strategy. That said it also covers the dangers of an approach that optimises only for partisanship. Partisanship can help you shift the distribution in your favour. But policy as fan service will blow up if you’re not strategic on where to use it

Morgan Jones@morganj0nes.bsky.social · last mo.

Yes exactly – I come back to this by @demofuturist.bsky.social a lot, about needing partisans who will go to bat for you. But tbh I think fan culture (certainly as I have seen it operate) often makes for ... decidedly mixed partisans. renewal.org.uk/blog/why-lab...

This is absolutely key for me - can see signs Burnham / people and orgs around him get the importance of strong digital comms and a core narrative but focus has (understandably) been on the policy programme meaning that has not yet translated into consistent attentional political practise

Steve Akehurst@steveakehurst.bsky.social · last mo.

Caveats, since i know some aren't keen: for sure this is not an impregnable theory. The emotionalism of it (attention grabbing fights, a party’s core story of who they are vs against) matters more than the deliverism. If it devolves into a confetti of transactional retail offers it will fail.

I basically think Andy should maintain the ordinary bloke aesthetic as much as possible, and only revert to something more (politically) orthodox when it is respectful and fitting the moment. This does not have to be the generic, often ill fitting, political suit. www.ft.com/content/1260...

What Andy Burnham’s clothes say about his politics

The British prime minister-in-waiting is keen to rewrite the rules of what authentic leadership looks like, starting with his clingy T-shirts

ft.com

Yep! I think what the overly literal, data-driven way of politics misses is that if you take a risk and win, you don't just win the election or whatever. You win other, less measurable things: momentum, admiration, uncertainty in your enemies' hearts, etc. You'd think *strategists* would know this.

Genuine devolution can also be viewed through the lens of new routes for developing political talent, both in terms of politicians but also the advisor class (sidenote: the mayors should be allowed more than one political advisor!).

The Times quotes a proReeves source on why Miliband shouldn't be ChEx: "If everyone from the unions to the city are saying they’re concerned, I don’t see how that’s the responsible choice" This catches much that has gone wrong. Letting interest groups tell you what you can't do is not governing.

I think the Westminster instinct that this is the right thing to do is totally understandable but also a poor fit for the current attention economy, where there is a benefit to taking risks and engaging with people outside of stage-managed settings.

Bild