Jennifer Robson 🇨🇦

@jrobson.bsky.social

Assoc. Prof. MPM @Carleton; parent; gardener & sometime tradesperson; social & tax policy; worried about details

Between meetings I've been playing with the US trade data again. Lining up their list of goods to be tariffed under s 338 (in 28 days), I find 40 goods where there were $0 worth of imports by US consumers in either 2024, 2025 or both years (most recent full annual data available).

Code has finished re-running! I get a total, across all 3 lists of about ~5.3% of annual Canadian imports into the US for US consumption (ie: not to be exported on elsewhere) using 2025 data or ~USD$20B, which will now cost US consumers up to USD$10B more if these come into effect in 30 days. 1/n

Jennifer Robson 🇨🇦@jrobson.bsky.social · 2w ago

I deleted my earlier estimate after finding an error in the code. The long list (18 pages) of affected goods is equivalent to just under 5% of Canadian goods imported into the US for consumption. That's not nothing, but it's not everything. Source for USTR data: dataweb.usitc.gov/trade/search...

So, once again, rest of the world, what is the value of a "deal" if the White House decides it has a feeling and invokes 338 on items, regardless of trade agreements? Canada is again being used as the test case.

In the eight months since Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill passed, SNAP enrollment has declined by 4.7 million, according to USDA data. In states where demographic data are available, about half the decline comes from kids losing food aid. The Trump administration describes this as a success story

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Hunger Crisis

His solution to the food affordability crisis is to cut programs that help people afford food.

open.substack.com

CRA has provided an answer: Data on returns for gender diverse and gender unknown filers are not included to avoid suppressing other variables while ensuring privacy (my wording). I mean, I didn't expect an answer to a random social media post from me, but now you have the same info I do.

Jennifer Robson 🇨🇦@jrobson.bsky.social · 2mo ago

thousands more where gender was unknown to the CRA. I have a hard time believing that so many Canadians suddenly changed their gender identity. Maybe the method of gender ID changed. Maybe the published data is wrong. Either way, not awesome. What happened CRA?

A funny thing happened in the most recent published personal income tax data from the CRA. For the last many years, the agency has recorded the number of returns filed by persons identified as male, female, gender diverse and gender unknown. In the most recent release (for 2024 tax year) /n

L'IRPP recrute! Nous recherchons un.e directeur/directrice du développement et des partenariats stratégiques pour diriger nos initiatives de collecte de fonds, de commandites, de partenariats et de développement des revenus. Date limite: 3 juillet, 17h (HE). Plus d'info→ irpp.org/fr/2026/06/d...

Bild

Le PIB réel du Canada a reculé pendant deux trimestres consécutifs – ce qui correspond à la définition d'une récession technique – bien qu'un examen attentif des données dresse un tableau plus contrasté de l'économie, selon Statistique Canada. ici.radio-canada.ca/rci/fr/nouve...

Le Canada entre en récession technique | RCI

La croissance économique du pays a stagné au 1er trimestre et le PIB réel a affiché une légère baisse en rythme annualisé, selon Statistique Canada.

ici.radio-canada.ca