Judicial Studies Institute

@justinbrno.bsky.social

Judicial Studies Institute (JUSTIN) is an interdisciplinary research centre at the Faculty of Law, Masaryk University https://justin.law.muni.cz/en

Attila Vincze joined the Current Reflections on EU Anti-Discrimination Law seminar (25–26 June 2026) in Trier. The seminar focused on current developments in EU anti-discrimination law, featuring experts from universities, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and European institutions📚

BildBild

📢 New chapter by @davidkosar.bsky.social & @katarinasipulova.bsky.social in “Elgar Companion to Female Chief Justices”, a monograph by edited by Erin F. Delaney efieldingd.bsky.social and Rosalind Dixon! 🏛️ It tells stories of Eliška Wagnerová & Iva Brožová in the post-communist Czech judiciary ⚖️

Edward Elgar Publishing@elgarpublishing.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Elgar Companion to Female Chief Justices in Comparative Perspective Edited by Erin F. Delaney @efieldingd.bsky.social and Rosalind Dixon 🆓 chapter | Judicial heroines? Comparative and conceptual reflections doi.org/10.4337/9781... More information: www.e-elgar.com/shop/isbn/97...

This book investigates the role of female judicial leaders of courts worldwide, by exploring their contributions to constitutional guardianship as well as feminist institutional and jurisprudential change.

Leading scholars outline the origins and significance of the steadily growing number of female chief justices and court presidents across the globe. They provide valuable insights into the conditions that support increased female participation and representation in law and public life, as well as ongoing challenges and barriers. Chapters draw on perspectives from both common and civil law, as well as feminist constitutional theory, covering topics such as judicial responses to democratic backsliding, comparative leadership styles, right-wing female actors in authoritarian regimes, and gendered silences in judicial histories. The book explores the notion of feminist judicial heroines, emphasising the difference between female versus feminist judges.

Happy to welcome Wojciech Zomerski, Max Weber Fellow at the EUI & researcher at the Centre for Legal Education and Social Theory (University of Wrocław). 📃Executive Dominance and the Rise of Populism in Power: A Mutually Reinforcing Dynamic? 👏 Thank you, Wojciech, for the engaging discussion. 📚

BildBild

Last week, Lukáš Hamřík joined the LSA Annual Meeting (May 28–31) in San Francisco & presented his research on how political parties across the EU respond to democratic backsliding in member states. Happy to see our team's represented. Well done, Lukáš! 👏

BildBildBild

New publication alert 📚 Our team member Michal Kovalčík has co-authored a new EuConst case note with Jakub Stádník (Faculty of Law, Charles University): "Preaching Consistency, Drinking Inconsistency". 🔓 Open Access – freely available to read. 🔗See the link below. 👏Congrats to both authors!

Bild

🏅The conference "ECtHR & Sport" last week at Faculty of Law MU explored ECtHR case law in sport—incl. arbitration, doping, expression, gender & fundamental rights. Michal Kovalčík discussed Article 8, focusing on state obligations & athletes’ privacy, also on the role of sports bodies & arbitration.

BildBild

Prof. Vladislava Stoyanova talked on positive obligations under the ECHR 🎓⚖️She explored many aspects of these obligations and the challenges of clarity and predictability in case law 📚 Great to welcome colleagues from Prague, Vienna, and guests from the Czech Constitutional Court 🇨🇿👏

BildBild

What happens when courts answer legal questions with AI? 🤖⚖️ The Czech Constitutional Court’s new chatbot isn’t just a search tool—it shapes how people understand the law. But who is accountable? Who shapes legal meaning in the age of AI? More @verfassungsblog.de in text by @ondrejkadlec.bsky.social

Verfassungsblog@verfassungsblog.de · 4mo ago

Europe’s first apex court chatbot 🤖 The Czech Constitutional Court now offers AI-generated answers about its case law. For ONDŘEJ KADLEC, this raises more questions than it answers: about transparency, accountability, and the interpretative role of AI. verfassungsblog.de/chatbot-czec...

Quote from the piece by Ondrej Kadlec: "The chatbot shapes which decisions users encounter, what counts as relevant case law, and how the boundaries of legal protection are perceived."

Great seminar last week with Agnieszka Kubal (in person) & Anna Ratecka (online) on abortion governance in post-2023 Poland. Their paper explores how executive guidelines reshape access amid parliamentary deadlock—creating “liminal law” and structured legal uncertainty. ⚖️📚

BildBild