Kate Aronoff

@katearonoff.bsky.social

staff writer @ The New Republic

I think it’s morally bankrupt to build a political faction around the cause of courting tech executives who have become progressively more dependent on fossil capital back into the Democrat Party, then pretend there is some objective reason to be scared of mentioning climate change

Fascinating how much of a firewall there seems to be between mainstream reporting on local anti-data center fights, and on frontier labs debating the ethics of AGI, open source models, automation, etc. Arguably these things are very related!

The people who wanna pick dumb fights over historical accuracy in period films never make the case that audiences should look at gnarly boils and rotting brown teeth for three hours

The question of whether politicians should talk about climate change is a weird stand-in for the question of how to govern like it exists, and help people make sense of the fact that the climate they grew up in no longer exists

Right-wingers yelping about being told (as in past heatwaves!) to set their AC to 78—so a grid that serves >8.5 million people doesn't shut down—really illustrating what AFAIK is a pretty US-specific pathology: being militantly proud of your extreme sensitivity to mild discomfort

" If left-of-center politicians and ostensibly fact-based news organizations aren’t willing to accurately interpret our climate-changed reality, however, the right will be more than happy to do it for them." newrepublic.com/article/2125...

This Is the Week for Democrats to Start Saying “Climate Change” Again

The party has gone quiet on the issue. As a heat wave sends temperatures soaring past 100, they can’t remain mum any longer.

newrepublic.com

Genuinely nauseating how much discourse about the European heat wave on X is people in the US blaming cultural preferences, emissions concerns, degrowth etc for Europeans not having AC. Whipped-up culture war sociopathy seemingly designed to blame a whole continent for their own suffering & death

UN climate negotiations watchers will be shocked to learn that signing a Plan to establish a Fund that will raise a certain amount of Dollars within a certain Timeframe means that one government will pay that entire amount

A little confused about the line among Dems that $300 bn for reconstruction is the thing to focus on. It’ll obviously be an unaccountable slush fund for Trump’s friends but does seem like the US should pay to rebuild a country it’s bombed for many months

One of the weirder right-wing subcultures are they guys claiming they're gonna "reindustrialize" the US by spending piles of government money using AI to make bloated drones that perform half as well as the ones guys in Ukraine make in their basement

Feel a bit crazed hearing the popularism set argue that major private investments will actually be well-liked and create public goods this time. 1. That was a major premise of Bidenomics, and most people didn’t know it happened…

“De La Espriella has proposed opening 10 ‘mega-prisons’ and said he wants to foster closer ties to the U.S. and Israel. He plans to slash 700,000 government employee and contractor jobs, ‘put God back into our children’s classes,’ and build a ‘Miracle Homeland.’”

Kate Aronoff@katearonoff.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I wrote about the presidential election in Colombia, where Trump has endorsed a guy who’s talked about building 10 mega-prisons and blowing up cats newrepublic.com/article/2112...

It’s true that in some hermetically sealed theoretical world AI data center development *could* deliver some broader public goods, but in that world we would already have the things people say those data centers could, theoretically, deliver. Extremely circular, fantastical thinking