Kristian

@kltblom.bsky.social

Private account. Not investment advice. Kristian is human and can make mistakes. Please double check responses.

i do get the handwringing about how academia relates to the public, but fundamentally, any proposal that involves academics not saying what they earnestly believe, even and especially when it is at variance from public opinion is a nonstarter for me

Lots of households in Virginia, Maine & n. Illinois have no view on stochastic parrots, no position in NVDA, and may even use AI. But they receive the AI buildout as a utility bill. That constituency is large, geographically concentrated in swing jurisdictions, and was recruited by a utility bill.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 8h ago

El-Sayed: "Mike Rogers is a guy who wants to put a data center in your backyard so he can make himself feel a little more manly by making an AI video ... he's a guy who went back to Florida so he could lick every single boot Donald Trump owns to bet for his endorsement."

The asset is the counterparty's ability to keep paying. The counterparty's ability to keep paying is a function of continued capital availability. Continued capital availability is a function of belief. There is the reflexive loop with a coupon attached.

I am a simple soul so I can't relate to poster's that think that their experience is "everyone". "everyone" and the repliers' "everyone" are drawn from populations that have already sorted themselves across platforms, who they follow, and professional networks. Structure precedes the belief

I am a member of and indigenous people that has been in conflict with imperial forces for well over 2000 years. For as long we have been told by various "priesthoods" that we are not allowed to adopt the latest technology. From steel swords and guns to books and AI, we have done so anyway.

In efforts towards solidarity and building/energizing a mass political movement to crush the Right, about the last thing I want to do is vilify anti-Right allies — even when they vilify anti-Right allies.

Authorship was always the wrong question. Accountability was always the right one. In terms of serving the truth it makes no difference whatsoever if Hank Green or others use AI for various purposes. What matters is if the person in question can be trusted to verify all claims before publishing.

Yeah I think they’re pretty open to not even keeping the rules in place if they derive more power from maintaining portions of the fascism which has been the norm now for several decades

I think a lot of people are hungering for a political party whose central value is that everyone belongs except intolerant people. We don't want people that are against freedom of movement across borders and inside. We don't want people that want to control our bodies and minds.

Jose Borges understood humans and words. Go read his "Las versiones homéricas" or "The Translators of The Thousand and One Nights", where writes about the Iliad and the Odyssey and The Thousand and One Nights. There is no "definitive" version of a story, only an infinite series of reinterpretations.

Kristian@kltblom.bsky.social · 7d ago

Yes, this whole controversy is anthropological and sociological gold. Hundreds of different social classes and cultures bickering about the meaning of words and not realizing that, while the words are one and the same, the interpretations are culture bound. Wilson is a lot more than a "translator".

I'm pretty neutral on whatever might happen with municipal grocery stores but I will say the way some of you are reacting like Mamdani launched a siege against Gristedes and now commies are in the aisles handing out apples & soup while singing the internationale should make you go outside for a bit