noam

@noamchompers.bsky.social

Please speak to me with the respect appropriate to someone who has been cited in the Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research

i do get the handwringing about how academia relates to the public, but fundamentally, any proposal that involves academics not saying what they earnestly believe, even and especially when it is at variance from public opinion is a nonstarter for me

new bsky thing i don't recall seeing before is people getting mad at reporters for using dynamic terms like 'momentum', 'coming back', 'closing the gap', etc. to describe vote counting

joker: how about a magic trick? i’m gonna make this pencil disappear (pencil falls over and joker slams the guys head into the table) joker: hold on let me set up the pencil again you jiggled the table

okay, new version of the trolley problem: a trolley is moving at a normal speed towards five people. those people see the trolley and have plenty of time to get out of the way. BUT on the other track... one person also sees and has plenty of time. everything is gonna be fine. what do you do?

Don't ask why I'm this deep into my camera roll (I am extremely jet lagged) but it's given me an opportunity to repost this now nearly decade-old classic.

That was probably the worst date l've ever been on in my entire life
He spent no less than an hour explaining the trolley problem to me
Spoiler alert: he would "find a way" to stop the trolley

finding two rationalist guys, one of whom thinks it's 66% likely we're in a simulation, and another of whom thinks it's 72% likely we're living in a simulation and arbitraging them

Here’s a very nerdy point but if you buy the reasoning that putatively gets you to ‘it’s likely we’re living in a simulation’, the same reasoning completely swamps that likelihood with Boltzmann brains is it’s actually ~0% we’re in a simulation by your lights