Stanford Law School

@law.stanford.edu

One of the nation's leading institutions for legal scholarship and education. https://law.stanford.edu/

Join us on Thursday, Sept. 17 at 5pm for our annual Constitution Day Lecture with Yale Law Professor Jack M. Balkin discussing "Technology and Constitutional Rot" and how the Algorithmic Society threatens democratic governance. RSVP: law.stanford.edu/event/consti...

Constitution Day Lecture: Technology and Constitutional Rot | Stanford Law School

Technological change affects the Constitution not only by creating new problems of constitutional interpretation, but also by changing the distributio

law.stanford.edu

SLS’s Executive Education program is launching the Legal Engineering Academy, a first-of-its-kind, two-week residential program for attorneys, executives, and other leaders who want to move beyond talking about AI and start building with it. law.stanford.edu/press/the-ri...

The Rise of Legal Engineering | Stanford Law School

A new kind of leader is emerging across the legal sector. These professionals combine legal expertise with an engineering mindset, helping shape how l

law.stanford.edu

Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative disagreements about representation—whether AI systems should mirror the world or be designed to promote a more inclusive future. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/unpac...

Unpacking AI Bias and the Antidiscrimination Law Dilemma | Stanford Law Review

In their Essay, Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative di

stanfordlawreview.org

The Supreme Court is disregarding factual evidence established by lower courts, raising concerns about judicial integrity. SLS's Duncan Hosie writes in @theatlantic.com about the Roberts Court's troubling departure from the "clear-error deference" standard. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...

The Supreme Court Isn’t Interested in Facts

In decision after decision, the conservative justices are ignoring the evidentiary record that lower courts have worked hard to establish.

theatlantic.com

Should courts use AI? SLS's Daniel E. Ho and Olivia Martin say the answer isn't banning—it's creating secure environments where judges can test models before deployment. Without this, courts risk falling behind litigants already using these tools. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/an-a...

An AI Playground for the Courts

Judges face an unsatisfactory menu of AI options. A secure, judiciary-controlled sandbox for testing frontier models is the better path.

lawfaremedia.org

Looking for a good book or two to start before the end of summer? It's not too late! Take a look at the Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List which offers up some of our professors’ favorite reads. law.stanford.edu/stanford-law...

Stanford Law School’s 2026 Summer Faculty Reading List | Stanford Law School

Looking for a good book or two to dig into during the summer? The Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List offers up some of our professors

law.stanford.edu

“The more daylight there is, the more trouble for Meta.” SLS's Nora Freeman Engstrom explains what’s at stake in the federal trial brought by state AGs over alleged harms to young users—and why its outcome could shape thousands of related cases. Read more: law.stanford.edu/2026/08/25/w...

What’s at Stake in the Meta Trial | Stanford Law School

(Originally published by Stanford Report on August 25, 2026.) Four states kicked off a closely-watched trial against Meta last week, alleging that the

law.stanford.edu

Stanford Law Professor Easha Anand elected to the American Law Institute, joining 27 other current or emeriti Stanford Law faculty in advancing ALI's mission to clarify, modernize, and improve American law. Read more:

Stanford Law School Professor Easha Anand Elected to the American Law Institute | Stanford Law School

Stanford Law School Professor Easha Anand, co-director of the law school’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, has been elected to the American Law Ins

law.stanford.edu

Who's responsible when medical AI fails? Stanford Law's Michelle Mello, co-leader of the Healthcare Ethical Assessment Lab for AI, examines the urgent need for guardrails in healthcare technology. Listen to the @kff.org episode:

Guardrails for AI in Health Care — How High? | KFF

AI is racing into everyday medicine. The rules of the road are still being written. Dr. Michelle Mello of Stanford, professor at both the Law School and the School of Medicine, and co-leader of its…

kff.org

Uber's new terms require users who sue the company to disclose litigation funding agreements and waive attorney-client privilege—but the requirements are "dubious at best," writes Rhode Center fellow Brianne Holland-Stergar. Read the full opinion:

Uber’s New Litigation Funding Terms Would Hinder Accountability

Opinion: Uber’s revised terms requiring access to documents exchanged with third-party litigation funders are likely unlawful but could effectively discourage lawsuits.

news.bloomberglaw.com

Stanford Legal examines presidential war powers with international law expert Allen Weiner. The episode explores how the Iran war evolved beyond its nuclear proliferation goals—and what that means for U.S. foreign policy. Listen to the episode:

The Iran War and the Limits of Presidential Power | Stanford Law School

Stanford’s Allen Weiner examines how the U.S. war with Iran raises questions about the president’s power to wage war and negotiate peace.

law.stanford.edu

A new Rule of Law Teaching Hub from SLS’s Neukom Center brings together syllabi, readings, country case studies, and practical guidance to help instructors build and strengthen rule of law courses—and connect a dispersed community working in the field.

Stanford Law School’s Neukom Center for the Rule of Law Launches New Teaching Hub | Stanford Law School

As legal and democratic institutions come under renewed strain around the world, interest in the rule of law as a field of study has grown. But profes

law.stanford.edu

How is the Supreme Court using history and tradition to reshape constitutional interpretation? Prof. Jeff Fisher examines pivotal 2026 rulings on birthright citizenship, voting rights, and agency independence in the latest Stanford Legal episode. Tune in:

Inside the Supreme Court’s Key 2026 Decisions | Stanford Law School

Jeff Fisher discusses a term marked by major rulings across executive power, voting, and civil rights, and what they signal about the Court’s trajectory.

law.stanford.edu

"If an observer only looked at cases in which the Supreme Court explicitly overturned precedent ... you wouldn't see the degree to which precedent was discarded," said Duncan Hosie, a legal scholar at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center.

'Stealth Overrulings': Did the Supreme Court Overturn More Precedent Than It Claimed? | Law.com

Across several rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority either outright overruled, or else functionally gutted, several precedents this term.

law.com

For Brionna Bolanos & Dayle Chung the Bremond Fellowship was a chance to pursue racial justice work that was intellectually rigorous & connected to why they came to law school. Watch the Stanford Center for Racial Justice’s fellows discuss their research.

Stanford Center for Racial Justice | Bremond Fellows 2025-2026 Cohort

With continued generous support from the Wilson Sonsini Foundation, this prestigious fellowship honoring legendary Bay Area attorney Harry Bremond offers Stanford Law School 2L and 3L students a…

youtu.be

Congrats to SLS RegLab and the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment on receiving an inaugural AI in Action Award from the Center for Civic Futures. Their AI tool helps unemployment adjudicators identify gaps and ask the right follow-up questions.

Stanford RegLab and Colorado Labor Department Receive Award for AI Adjudication Tool | Stanford Law School

Resolving an unemployment claim often turns on asking the right questions. Adjudicators must determine which facts matter, identify what is missing or

law.stanford.edu

“We propose that state supreme courts amend their rules of professional conduct to impose a uniform ‘hold open’ date for offers until Oct. 1 of students’ 2L year for 2L summer positions.” @marklemley.bsky.social & I have an op-ed in Bloomberg on early recruiting news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...

State Supreme Courts Can Resolve Early Legal Recruiting Mess

Opinion: Imposing a uniform "hold open" date for job offers to law students would likely put much-needed brakes on accelerated recruiting.

news.bloomberglaw.com