Lia Merivaki_Ph.D.

@liamerivaki.bsky.social

Election science, info integrity, AI & Democracy, Public Policy. Director of Foley Institute @ Wazzu. US Elections team @ The Carter Center. Non-resident fellow @ Center for Democracy & Technology. Team #voteredu 🗳️😷🇬🇷 🇺🇲

On birth certificates: the design varies from state to state, and I bet it would be required to show that one's certificate is "official," meaning it has to be apostilled by each state authority. Apostilles are date stamped, so I also bet it will be required to apostille every election cycle.

This is called a data void, and these candidates are addressing it by filling the info environment with information voters needs to know. LLMs will pick up those sources instead of making it up, or drawing from low hanging quality sources.

Amanda Litman@amandalitman.bsky.social · 2w ago

In the NYT today: How CampSight is helping candidates better inform voters by helping candidates know & change what LLMs are saying about them. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/19/u...

Dustin Lloyd, a Democratic primary candidate for Missouri's state legislature, was a well-known member of his community when he started his political campaign.
But there was one important group that didn't seem to know him at all: A.I. chatbots.
If voters quizzed a chatbot like OpenAl's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini about Mr.
Lloyd, they would find only basic information that failed to convey his focus on helping small businesses.
Fortunately for Mr. Lloyd, there was a fix.
He tweaked his online presence, publishing a Q&A about himself on his campaign website. Later, when the chatbots were quizzed again, they dutifully connected that personal history to his policy goals.
Editing A.I's output proved to be easier than he imagined. Since then, Mr. Lloyd said, "I'm constantly working on it every day."

You know what are the true threats to our democracy? Not in ranking order: 1. Gerrymandering 2. Unregulated campaign finance 3. Disinformation 4. Defunding CISA 5. Firing EAC commissioners 6. Asking states' unredacted voter roll data

National Intelligence Council 2021 report directly contradicts Trump's lies about alleged Chinese interference: “We assess that China did not deploy interference efforts and considered but did not deploy influence efforts intended to change the outcome of the US presidential election"

Bild

@npr don't use the term election officials really dislike: purges. It's routine list maintenance, and removal of ineligible voters. Yes, it is governed by federal law, and yes many times eligible voters are impacted. But "purge" is not a term used in election admin. share.google/Emh143cjwreY...

A federal law bans late voter roll purges. Republicans are pushing to reinterpret it

There's a ban on most states systematically purging voter rolls within 90 days before Election Day. Republicans are pushing courts to reinterpret that longstanding protection for eligible voters.

share.google

Election Day means the day when voters cast their vote, not the day when vote counting is completed. States govern election rules. it's wrong to punish voters who went through all the hoops to cast a legal vote, because of factors beyond their control (postal delays).

Back in 2018, I did a ton of interviews with farmers in MS, AL, and LA for an EPA project. Long story short, most of them voted for Trump and despise their customers (people in cities who buy their food). They know subsidies will keep on rolling no matter what. They hold the food supply hostage.

Dr. Sandra Steingraber 🏳️‍🌈@ssteingraber1.bsky.social · 3mo ago

ICYMI: US Farm Bureau reports that 7/10 US farmers can’t afford all the fertilizer they need this year, and 6/10 report worsening finances. Hilarious until you realize they grow your food. Read closely. 73% of the guys making your oatmeal are in trouble. Veggies? 61% www.fb.org/market-intel...