Liam Hogan

@liamjhogan.bsky.social

Award winning #Shortstory #Writer #SciFi 📚: A Short History of the Future, Northodox Press #Fantasy 📚: Happy Ending Not Guaranteed, Arachne Press Oxford Physics, Codexian. Everything, Ever ✍️: http://happyendingnotguaranteed.blogspot.co.uk

Everyone knows by now - even Burnham - the cure for small boats is big boats. Provide a safe legal route and eliminate the need for people smugglers, with all of its attendant ills. Heck, charge for the service if you have to, as long as you're massively undercutting the smugglers.

Dan Sohege@danielsohege.bsky.social · 3d ago

Even Home Office's own analysis shows tougher measures force more people into longer, more dangerous routes and exploitation. Tackling smugglers starts with ensuring people don't have to use them. Meanwhile, Labour's own policies mean more people are forced to use them. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

It would be great if trees and plants that died on me would conduct an exit survey and tell me what it was that I did so wrong... So that I didn't repeat the mistake. (Lost a fruit tree to this year's drought onslaught, despite - I thought - sufficient watering. Lost redcurrant bushes - AGAIN.)

Rather than gifting mega US tech companies permission to build all-consuming data centres in the UK while ripping off artists and replacing employment with AI licences, the UK government should charge all UK employers that want to use AI in their workplace a tax towards retraining employees.

Went to the BFI to see "Ish" because a friend: Avin Shah, is in it (and is brilliant in it). It is a absolute DELIGHT to see/read/listen to things created by creative, brilliant, surprising friends. You don't get that with AI. Doesn't matter how "good" AI gets, there's no-one human to celebrate.

Bild

Science cuts are education cuts, environment cuts, growth cuts, economy cuts, health cuts, future cuts. Investment in research - not just science, across the board - pays dividends. Science funding isn't something that you can just turn off and back on - we lose the scientists AND the data record.

James O'Malley@jamesomalley.co.uk · last wk.

Terrible news. Aside from learning more about the universe, we're not going to get much economic growth by cutting science funding. (If only we had a Prime Minister who was interested in supporting the north, and Manchester in particular, who could stop this.) www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

Apparently it's racist for a black man not to like Trump. Hmm...? (Maybe there are PLENTY of other reasons not to like Trump, other than his race? Maybe LeBron James liking or not liking Trump has very little to do with his status as a sporting legend? Maybe...) www.bbc.co.uk/sport/basket...

President Donald Trump says NBA star LeBron James 'maybe a racist'

United States President Donald Trump said LeBron James might be "a racist" when asked if the basketball star is the "best ever" to play the sport.

bbc.co.uk

Gosh, I wonder if these two things are related: "Trump vows to investigate EU over fining of US tech companies" www.bbc.co.uk/news/article... "Major tech companies, including Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon, have donated millions of dollars to funds behind Trump's campaign and presidency."

Trump vows to investigate EU over fining of US tech companies

The US president says fines against Google, as well as Apple, Meta and Amazon, should be "entirely reversed."

bbc.co.uk

Trump's tariffs were never about whatever act he hides behind, whether emergency powers or accusations of forced labour failings. They were never about American jobs, economy, or reducing imports. They weren't about who pays - exporters, importers, or US customers. Trump's tariffs ARE the point. (+)

The US criticises and threatens consequences for the UK not supporting them, Iran criticises and threatens consequences for the UK for supporting the US. And I have to say you can kind of see Iran's point of view, more than the US's.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ce... One wonders why the US doesn't just steal the enriched Uranium from Iran and give it the Saudi Arabia. That WOULD be the Trump move, surely? (With a counter move 30 years down the line when the Saudis are no longer US chums...)

US to announce deal allowing Saudi Arabia to develop nuclear power

The agreement could be worth billions of dollars to the US, whose companies could be involved in building a facility to produce enriched uranium.

bbc.co.uk

As tweeted by Trump: Venezuela War: 1 day, 0 DEAD. So I guess that confirms exactly what sort of operation it was, and not - as Trump claimed - "a law-enforcement action, with military support, that the president has "inherent constitutional authority" to undertake.

Burnham's "No 10 North" (Manchester) plans makes sense of his pledge to restore HS2 to Manchester leg. He wants a quick commute between the two. Which... fine, but it does seem rather like it's all about him.

Burnham's electricity VAT giveaway sounds like a winning wheeze, but can only be considered progressive if it is paid for in a way that targets higher earners or larger (tax avoiding...) corporations. Since everyone benefits, the rich as much as the poor, it is imperative that the rich pay for it.

Who won the World Cup? Spain. Erling Haaland. England v France (with added bonus of no Trump pitch invasion). Omar Abdulkadir Artan (despite not getting into US). Spidercam. Who lost? The USA. Fifa. Trump. Infantino. Hydration Breaks. Half time shows. VAR. Argentina. Spidercam. Football. Spectators.

Astonishing that James Cleverly - or anyone - can say "If he is really serious about Government, he should lay out proposals (to) cut welfare, fund defence..." Because what the UK really needs is more people unable to manage, and more missiles.