Liang Ge (they/them)

@liangge11.bsky.social

Lecturer in Sociology @morgancentre.bsky.social University of Manchester Sociology Department | Digital Media & Tech, Digital Methods, Gender & Sexuality, ESEA Creative Industries and Popular Cultures | they/them

Sympoietic creativity and the boundaries of qing: digital romance writers negotiating generative AI - AI & SOCIETY This study investigates how writers of high-velocity Chinese digital romance fiction negotiate the arrival of generative AI at the desk. Drawing on a 4-year multi-sited digital...

Sympoietic creativity and the boundaries of qing: digital romance writers negotiating generative AI - AI & SOCIETY

This study investigates how writers of high-velocity Chinese digital romance fiction negotiate the arrival of generative AI at the desk. Drawing on a 4-year multi-sited digital ethnography (2021–2025) and interviews with 34 writers on Jinjiang Literature City alongside sustained forum observation and platform-discourse analysis, this article tracks how authors of serial romance work under the time discipline of the daily-update treadmill in the presence of large language models (LLMs). I argue that what is emerging is sympoietic creativity: a distributed practice of “making-with” the machine that is fraught, ambivalent and strategic rather than collaborative or replacement-driven. Four modes of negotiation co-exist across the cohort. In strategic collaboration, writers delegate world-building, naming and structural error-checking to the LLM. In cyborg authorship, they curate machine-generated prose under acute platform pressure, at the cost of what they themselves call the work’s “aura.” In conditional refusal, they hold the line at the inter-subjective texture of feeling they consider, on present evidence, beyond the model’s competence. In narrative incorporation, they thematize algorithmic logic in the fiction itself, casting the algorithmic system as villain and human emotion as the route to victory. Throughout, I reserve qing—the inter-subjective, somatic bond from which affect, desire, and embodiment become legible to the reader—as a precise analytical term distinct from generic English-language emotion or affect. The human zone these writers preserve is not a permanent or guaranteed space, but an unstable equilibrium sustained by reader vigilance, platform metrics, and writer self-discipline—any of which could withdraw.

link.springer.com

6/ So the question is not whether humans are becoming 'too attached' to AI. It is who designs these intimate relationships, whose interests they serve, and which forms of human connectivity and intimate practices they reshape or displace.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 2mo ago

China is trying to regulate how people fall in love with AI. I spoke to @newscientist.com about the new rules, and about why regulating individual usage may be the least effective place to intervene. www.newscientist.com/article/2580...

5/ These apps are built to be hard to put down. That is not a side effect of the design. It is the design. Regulating the user, rather than the incentive, leaves the engine running.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 2mo ago

China is trying to regulate how people fall in love with AI. I spoke to @newscientist.com about the new rules, and about why regulating individual usage may be the least effective place to intervene. www.newscientist.com/article/2580...

4/ Effective governance has to look past particular interactions to what produces them: commercial incentives, design choices, data practices, and the social conditions that make synthetic intimate practices so compelling in the first place.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 2mo ago

China is trying to regulate how people fall in love with AI. I spoke to @newscientist.com about the new rules, and about why regulating individual usage may be the least effective place to intervene. www.newscientist.com/article/2580...

3/But rules aimed at individual usage will only go so far. Users move to specialist services such as Xingye, Maoxiang. They reach foreign LLM platforms through VPNs. They run models locally. The relationship outlives the regulation.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 2mo ago

China is trying to regulate how people fall in love with AI. I spoke to @newscientist.com about the new rules, and about why regulating individual usage may be the least effective place to intervene. www.newscientist.com/article/2580...

2/ The rules matter for one reason above all: China has recognised and treated AI companions as more than technological products. These apps are becoming essential part of people's emotional and social lives, raising real questions about dependency, intimacy, childhood, and platform responsibility.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 2mo ago

China is trying to regulate how people fall in love with AI. I spoke to @newscientist.com about the new rules, and about why regulating individual usage may be the least effective place to intervene. www.newscientist.com/article/2580...

@bookshop.bsky.social was interviewed (alongside the brilliant @liangge11.bsky.social!) for this piece on an EU commissioner RPF ship (Attalourné 😘) that's blowing up in Chinese fan spaces right now. Fascinating transcultural fandom dynamics!

Lucie Ronfaut@lucieronfaut.com · 5mo ago

Super article de ma chère @elisabraun.bsky.social sur ces internautes chinoises qui se passionnent pour Gabriel Attal et Stéphane Séjourné, et les enjeux politiques que ça soulève (avec du @fansplaining.bsky.social dedans, joie !) www.euractiv.com/news/the-unl...

Very happy to share that I’ve joined the Editorial Board of The Sociological Review!Over the next five years, I look forward to supporting more globally engaged sociological research, particularly in the areas of intimacies, media culture and technologies, the Global South, and gender& sexuality!😊

The Sociological Review Foundation@thesociologicalreview.org · 7mo ago

⭐ WELCOME to the 20 scholars who have joined The Sociological Review journal’s Editorial Board this month Read more about these appointments: buff.ly/Jvu5XS0

Welcome To The Journal
The Sociological Review Is Welcoming 20 New Members To Its Editorial Board 
The Soc Rev

🔹 The Fluency Trade-off: I analyze why models like DeepSeek-R1 (with a higher hallucination rate) differ from factual optimizers like ChatGPT-o1. The paper examines how "Chain-of-Thought" reasoning enhances creativity but inherently amplifies "spectral" outputs.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 9mo ago

We often dismiss AI hallucinations as mere technical failures or epistemic risks. In this article,I propose a different perspective: these generative anomalies act as hermeneutic knots: sites where algorithmic noise and human agency entangle to produce new modes of meaning-making

🔹I argue for sympoietic creativity:a collaborative practice where humans curate machine stochasticity rather than simply commanding a tool This work challenges us to harness AI's disruptive potential for posthuman futures while maintaining strict ethical vigilance.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 9mo ago

We often dismiss AI hallucinations as mere technical failures or epistemic risks. In this article,I propose a different perspective: these generative anomalies act as hermeneutic knots: sites where algorithmic noise and human agency entangle to produce new modes of meaning-making

We often dismiss AI hallucinations as mere technical failures or epistemic risks. In this article,I propose a different perspective: these generative anomalies act as hermeneutic knots: sites where algorithmic noise and human agency entangle to produce new modes of meaning-making

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 9mo ago

🆕Publication Arrived!!! Are AI hallucinations bugs to be fixed, or the start of a new kind of creativity? My new paper, "Spectral imaginings and sympoietic creativity," explores how we might move beyond binary framings of AI errors. Check it out here: doi.org/10.1177/2053...

This paper examines a rapidly expanding human–nonhuman digital intimacy. We explore how women players form deep affective attachments with virtual male characters in women-oriented otome games in their everyday life💫 A core contribution is our proposal of the concept “digital intimacy literacies.”

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 10mo ago

✨Thrilled to share our new article published in Information, Communication & Society: “Digital literacies of intimacy: women’s engagement and learning in otome video games”!!! 🥳 💥 🎉 Open access link: doi.org/10.1080/1369...

We use the term “digital intimacy literacies” to describe the set of socio-technical, affective, sensory, and narrative competencies through which women players learn to interpret, negotiate, and cultivate intimate relationships in digital environments.

Liang Ge (they/them)@liangge11.bsky.social · 10mo ago

✨Thrilled to share our new article published in Information, Communication & Society: “Digital literacies of intimacy: women’s engagement and learning in otome video games”!!! 🥳 💥 🎉 Open access link: doi.org/10.1080/1369...