Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe

@lisalibrarian.bsky.social

There are people who decry the corporate and proprietary homogenisation of the internet and personal computing; people who yearn for community-led alternatives. When you point out that those alternatives exist and all they have to do is use them, they say, "No, not like that."

jenny tightpants@jtp.bsky.social · 3w ago

noticing an increasingly common phenomenon of people online who hate their torment nexus ass propietary software but for some reason refuse to even entertain the idea of learning to use a non-torment alternative.

Everyone in schol comm, please repeat after me: Standardization does not equal quality control; standardization does not equal quality control; standardization does not equal quality control; standardization does not equal quality control; standardization does not equal quality control; stand . . .

📢 Academics & journal editors: I'm working on a story about donors using financial intermediaries to fund studies "anonymously". - Is this common in your field? - Does your uni have rules to prevent this? - Would your journal accept a declaration of an "anonymous donation"? 📱sehill.11 on Signal

Scaling up! "The acquisition deepens Wiley’s proprietary content position for use in AI and data analytics, at a moment when demand for trusted peer-reviewed research content is accelerating rapidly as corporations build out AI models and applications."

This is scholarly misconduct. We have seen university presidents removed from their positions for far less. Why are we saying it's just an editing error if "it was AI" The lack of accountability is astonishing

Sarah Weinman@sarahweinman.com · 3mo ago

Grimly hilarious lede of the week so far from @benmullin.bsky.social: "The author of a nonfiction book about the effects of artificial intelligence on truth acknowledged on Monday that he had included numerous made-up or misattributed quotes concocted by A.I."

NEW TODAY: A few thoughts for publishers on developing "a library relations strategy — a deliberate, sustained commitment to engaging with the library community in ways that are substantive, reciprocal, and structurally supported, operating alongside sales relationships."

Why Every Publisher Needs a Library Relations Strategy - The Scholarly Kitchen

Publishers that lack a deliberate library relations strategy are making consequential decisions without important and useful community perspectives.

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

For as long as I've been attending conference sessions, webinars, etc., about preprint servers, the suggestions for improving them are all to make them function more like journals. Slowly, we will approach convergence?

Juan Pablo Alperin@juancommander.scholcommlab.ca · 3mo ago

Nice to see this interest our work on preprint moderation (led by @nataschachtena.bsky.social): "Why preprint servers are increasing moderation — and what that means for researchers". www.nature.com/articles/d41... [archive without paywall here: archive.is/x98qF]

Figure 4 of this newly released report worries me. E.g., only 75% of library directors agree they are "confident in my ability to articulate the library’s value proposition in a way that aligns with the strategic goals of the college/university administration" (sr.ithaka.org/publications...).

US Library Survey 2025 - Ithaka S+R

The US Library Survey examines how library leaders conceptualize their work—what they prioritize, how they navigate decision-making, and how they align the library with the goals of their parent insti...

sr.ithaka.org