Sean P O'hAodha

@maddygram.bsky.social

Dem. Descendant of nits who vexed Cromwell. Chief of the Name. Chicago born, chum of Fionn MacCumhail, MacConglinne, MacDatho. Finley Peter Dunne, Blessed Liam Shakespeare. R1B1 etc. Fuck Trump. Punch a Nazi Today -- Captain America. 🐝

CEOs are raking in $17 million a year, 300 times what their own workers make, and John Husted’s answer is “learn to budget.” Sherrod Brown wrote the law that got over 100,000 Ohioans their stolen pensions back. Vote for who fights for you, not who lectures you. #BlueWaveIn90Days

Trump claims more votes were cast than voters exist in Wayne County by a lot, zero evidence, same claim debunked since 2020. He's pre-loading fake mail-in ballots that will surprisingly show up before a single ballot is disputed. This is the playbook now, not a reaction to anything.

Bild

Once again. It's simple! The only reason that the Epstein files have not been published is that they incriminate the president of the United States, and those others who are in a position to stop them from being released.

I’m sure there have been many arguments in the White House as to why he can’t wear his own 3rd-World-Dictator-style military uniform. I bet he has a design for it with a shitload of gold piping everywhere and big fucking gold epaulets.

ICYMI last night, DHS is currently being fined every day for contempt of court until it coughs up the cell phone records of officers involved in immigration stops in L.A. last year that looked like racial profiling rather than reasonable cause. short thread -->

Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · yesterday

Fed. judge holds DHS in civil contempt of court for refusing "intentionally and not in good faith" to provide plaintiffs with phone images they intend to use to prove DHS was racially profiling people arrested in Los Angeles without reasonable suspicion. Order from July 28, unsealed today.

B. Defendants’ Noncompliance Is Intentional And Not In Good Faith. Having found that Defendants are in violation of the January 16 Forensic Imaging Order, the burden now shifts to Defendants to show that they were unable to comply. Affordable Media, 179 F.3d at 1239 (9th Cir. 1999). They fail to make that showing. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and counsel’s representations at the hearing, it does not appear that Defendants’ noncompliance is due to an inability to comply. Instead, the clear and convincing evidence shows that Defendants have acted intentionally and not in good faith.