Mario Trujillo

@mariotrujillo.bsky.social

senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation

A First Amendment jawboning lawsuit in Illinois against the federal government can move forward. The suit claims the Attorney General illegally coerced Apple and Facebook to disable user content that tracked ICE activity.

Bondi and Noem “demanded, rather than requested, that Facebook and Apple censor Plaintiffs’ speech.” As such, the Court found that “Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that Defendants violated their First Amendment rights through coercion of Facebook and Apple.”

COME WORK at the ACLU! @aclu-norcal.bsky.social is hiring attorneys to work on tech and civil rights (my team) and the criminal legal/immigration system. These folks will work at the cutting edge of legal and policy efforts in California and beyond. Apply here: www.aclunorcal.org/jobs/staff-a...

Staff Attorney / Senior Staff Attorney - ACLU of Northern California

Develop and carry out litigation and policy advocacy to advance to protect and defend civil rights and civil liberties for all Californians.

aclunorcal.org

As reporting continues to surface about Madison Square Garden using facial recognition tech to identify, harass & ban people, it's important to highlight the many venues have prioritized artist & patron safety by pledging NOT to use this tech.

The image features a vibrant and colorful background that transitions through gradients of pink, orange, blue, and green. Overlaying this background is a series of bold, white text blocks against a black backdrop. The main message at the top states, "OVER 30 VENUES HAVE COMMITTED TO NOT USE INVASIVE SURVEILLANCE TECH." Below this, a numbered list includes three venue names: "1 BLACK CAT DC," "2 THE ROCKWELL," and "3 HOUSE OF YES." At the bottom of the image, another line of text reads, "HERE ARE JUST A FEW…" There are also decorative arrows pointing in various directions, enhancing the dynamic feel of the design.Bild

“I hear a lot of privacy nihilism from people, like, ‘They already have our data, they’re already surveilling us,’” EFF’s @lisafemia.bsky.social told @mercurynews.com, but surveillance isn’t inevitable. “There’s a real misunderstanding of data and its sensitivity.”

Surveillance technology is inevitable. Or is it?

From doorbell cameras to automated license plate readers, public surveillance has expanded rapidly since 2020. Is the tide finally turning? We sit down with Electronic Freedom Foundation attorney Lisa...

mercurynews.com

Second (but *not* last) #SCOTUS ruling is in Chatire (the geofence warrants case). For a 6-3 majority (with Thomas, Alito, and Barrett dissenting), Justice Kagan holds that a geofence warrant *is* a Fourth Amendment search, but the Court remands to see if the Fourth Amendment was actually violated:

supremecourt.gov

“At the risk of saying more obvious things, the difference between a helpful private agent, a corporate advertising bot, and a government spy comes down mainly to a matter of prompting, and maybe a bit of model fine-tuning.”

Matthew Green@matthewdgreen.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I wrote a new post about the privacy risks of on-phone agents like Apple’s new Siri, and how private inference isn’t any sort of silver bullet. blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2026/06/09/a...

Very helpful recap of the gender-affirming-care subpoena cases. Like Stanford, I fear that the suits against Stanford and NYU might "result in the worst-case scenario for the plaintiffs." Today's hearing in San Jose might offer more clarity. www.cnn.com/2026/06/05/p...

Trump administration escalates legal push for medical records of trans minors | CNN Politics

Parents said in court papers they’re worried that having records disclosed could expose them to retaliation by the Trump administration.

cnn.com

Meta is unhappy b/c they handed us a boiler plate statement that just repeats things we already wrote at the top of the piece (minus calling our work "sensational"). We sent Meta a full explanation of what was in the piece and provided 10 detailed questions. They refused to answer any of them.

Andy Stone on X: It was a choice to bury Meta's statement in the sixteenth paragraph of this story, Dhruv.

Re-upping part of it here for those that didn't read all the way down:
"Nothing has shipped to consumers and no final decision has been made on what to do here, if anything."

ICYMI: DOJ is seeking the names, addresses, and banking information of Reddit and X users, issuing grand jury subpoenas to the companies as it escalates efforts to identify critics of the Trump administration's deportation efforts buff.ly/xNSIF16 (gift link)

Bild