Mark (he/him)

@markedwardson.com

Just another engineer who fell down the urbanism rabbit hole Vancouver/Victoria

the Canada Line is often characterized as disruptive (by critics) or cheap (by proponents) thanks to a secretive P3 structure, but is imo better understood as the government of the time being agnostic about construction techniques and consciously making trade-offs to reduce costs

BildBildBild
Mark (he/him)@markedwardson.com · 2w ago

Recently found myself reading the judgement for one of the Cambie merchant lawsuits and was struck by just how much shorter the disruptions were for the CL. This one business experienced 3 years of general disruption, and only 8 months of actual cut-and-cover work. www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/d...

As a side note, this is an example where Vancouver urbanism is unambiguously worse than Calgary: trail networks in the suburbs here are much more discontinuous and often consist of adding a shared-use sign to a sidewalk

BildBild
Mark (he/him)@markedwardson.com · 3w ago

likewise, despite its reputation amongst urbanism circles as sprawl-hell, Calgary's trail network is genuinely quite impressive and continues to get built out alongside new subdivisions (dark blue = trails/protected bike lanes)

I wish we could shake libs out of the consensus position that the progressiveness of a tax policy can be solely evaluated by looking at one side of the ledger I have had many conversations like this “This tax is regressive” >But the revenue is being spent progressively “Had not considered this”

In better zoning systems than ours (i.e. Japan's), this is a non-issue because they allow multiple uses instead of mandating one. People will build commercial if it's allowed and there's demand for it, you don't need to forbid residential to make it happen.

I have nothing to add that hasn't already been said but this is an act of abject cowardice. All the endless hand-wringing about towers and concentrating development on existing rental areas, and when the opportunity comes to do something about it everyone except Lucy votes for the status quo.

Peter Waldkirch 華彼德@pwaldkirch.bsky.social · 4w ago

Ok, they severed the SES part, so this is the vote on the main part of it: A-J. And, the Villages Plan is dead. This hurts. ABC, COPE, and the Greens are all unwilling to take even quite modest action on expanding low-rise apartment areas.

Edmonton continues to show it's possible to have newly built, ground-oriented housing for families in existing neighbourhoods at a reasonable price. You only have to make it legal and feasible. Here's a 3bed for $1,895 with a $500 lease signing bonus.

Exterior photo of modern contemporary townhouse units featuring brick and white siding with black trim and metal railings. Three townhouses are visible with large windows and private entrances. Landscaping includes young trees and shrubs. Image is labeled '2 of 18' indicating multiple units available. Listing shows 3 beds, 2.5 baths townhouse at $1,895 per month, located nearby within 6 kilometers.Rental listing description for a brand-new 3-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom main floor townhouse home in West Edmonton at 14921 106 Avenue. Text includes property highlights such as brand-new construction, open-concept layout, stainless steel appliances, and completed landscaping by October 15. Lease details show $1,895 monthly rent, one-month damage deposit, $100/month detached garage, $50/month per pet (up to 3 pets), 12-month lease, and move-in ready status.Continuation of rental listing details showing lease terms and application requirements. Includes $1,895 monthly rent, garage and pet policies, 12-month lease requirement, move-in ready status, a $500 move-in bonus offer for applications submitted within 24 hours, and notation that serious applicants with verified credit, income, and employment are required. Call-to-action encourages messaging to book a private tour.

The Villages Plan is not that controversial & Council should approve all 17 villages. There was not that much opposition considering most complaints were poorly founded & the result of NIMBY fear-mongering. For comparison, consider 1805 Larch, ONE 5-storey apartment building.

Apartment at 2nd and Larch, 1805 Larch Street

A nuclear deterrent is not something you build hastily to compensate for a lack of conventional military power or security. In many ways, doing so relies on a bedrock of conventional deterrence, on information security, and on well-developed clandestine networks and alliances outside the US system.

Putting aside that this is slopulism that will make parking availability worse, it bears noting that the reason there's paid parking in front of beaches and community centres in the first place is that Vancouver Liberal park commissioners Scott Jensen and Brennan Bastyovanszky made it so.

Screenshot of Park Board meeting minutes from May 6, 2024 where Cmm'rs Jensen and Bastyovanszky vote to enact paid parking at Spanish Banks BeachScreenshot of Park Board meeting minutes from October 20, 2025 where Cmm'rs Jensen and Bastyovanszky vote to enact paid parking at Langara Golf Course, VanDusen Botanical Garden, and Hillcrest, Kerrisdale and Trout Lake Community Centres
Kareem Allam@kareem42.bsky.social · last mo.

Within the first year of a Vancouver Liberal Government, we're going to get rid of every single parking meter in front of beaches and community centres throughout the entire city.

Got to try out the new Solaris trolleybus today. It was a smooth ride and the AC is going to be a godsend in the summer. Very excited for it to enter service!

New Solaris trolleybus at Nanaimo Station

Introducing Livable CRD 🗳️ A non-partisan coalition making Capital Region municipal elections easier to navigate. We publish a candidate scorecard + questionnaire on transit, housing, climate, healthcare & more. We inform, we don't endorse. 👉 livablecrd.ca #YYJ #BCpoli

Livable CRD

Livable CRD is a non-partisan coalition scoring Capital Regional District municipal candidates on transit, housing, climate, arts, and other livability issues.

livablecrd.ca