mark thompson

@markposts.bsky.social

data software engineer @ Twenty3 Sports || sport for all || (he/him) || ⚽🎾💻📰🏎️🤖 - mrkthmpsn.github.io

Started drafting a piece yesterday about using AI in writing (which I've tried my hand at (nothing published with it, don't worry), with a parallel to using AI in coding (which I do every day). Think it'll be interesting, but part just boils down to these first two sentences

Charlotte Weatherill@ckweatherill.bsky.social · last wk.

The point isn't to produce essays, it's to teach students how to think for fuck's sake. The minute you automate that, it's over. You might as well close the course. Which they're also doing. This is an attack on learning, and everyone is just shrugging.

A lot of this is just 'huh, I wonder how they did that' questions asked in the wrong tone. Like 'how did they build the pyramids' is a question that could lead to fascinating answers about engineering and sociology of the time, but you say it as 'how DID they build the pyramids, eh' and, pop.

James O'Malley@jamesomalley.co.uk · 2w ago

New mad conspiracy theory just dropped. (Answers: It's a GCHQ building, and I presume black paint and doors are available at B&Q.)

I haven't yet seen people saying this* but should the 'AI watermarks on images' conversation also apply to text too? The tells are rapidly gonna fade away, partly as models improve and partly as peoples' 'this is how to sound less AI' prompts improve (*not seen != not being said somewhere)

Prof Sam Illingworth@samillingworth.com · 2w ago

🚩 My 2010 PhD thesis is ‘70% AI’ I ran my 2010 PhD thesis through an AI detector. It flagged 70% as AI, then tried to sell me a ‘humanise’ fix. Either I am a time traveller, or these tools do not work. Link to my thesis in the comments to try yourself. #AIDetection #HigherEd 🧪 #AI

Screen grab of an AI detection test showing 70%.