Molly Brady

@maureenebrady.com

Professor @ Harvard Law writing on property institutions, land use, private law, and eminent domain. Section 3 for life. Always half-joking. (AKA Maureen.)

I know everyone’s all down on articles and blah because of AI, but in the last week I have been reading like 5 really amazing pieces that have been or will be submitted this cycle. Slop can’t crowd out the incredibly cool work out there, if we do our job of reading/uplifting it!

The various jobs I have taken with two kids four and under = not for the faint of heart. Autoreply is getting dangerously close to “I’m crying and will respond to you when I can see”

Help me crowdsource: best blog posts/articles/videoed-advice on developing and writing books? Not sure I'm actually doing that, but I feel like I have a good sense of the article development process by now + the luxury of some reading time this summer, so hoping to learn from the best (you).

Such a delight to work with @stanlrev.bsky.social on this—come for the poaching poem, stay for the property arguments.

Stanford Law Review@stanlrev.bsky.social · 4mo ago

In her Essay, @maureenebrady.com posits the Supreme Court has a level-of-generality problem in cases like Wolford v. Lopez and Bruen. Brady argues courts should be transparent about how their choices reintroduce means-ends reasoning. Read more here: review.law.stanford.edu/online/prope...

My favorite CoPilot story is when CoPilot told me it could help me solve a problem if I forwarded a bunch of emails to it at CoPilot@harvard.edu. So I did, then it told me it couldn’t see them. On further inquiry, it confessed it did not have an email address.

Post nicht verfügbar.

Thanks Jake! The silver lining of learning about the 2nd amendment against my will = all the great people doing work over that way

Jake Charles@jacobdcharles.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Property law expert extraordinaire @maureenebrady.com has an excellent new post up this morning at the @dukefirearmslaw.bsky.social's blog: The Level-of-Generality Problem in Wolford. firearmslaw.duke.edu/2026/03/the-... Like her longer piece (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....), it's a must read!

NEW: Kelo may be settled, but courts continue to grapple w/ limits on eminent domain. Drawing on debates from 19th century state conventions, @maureenebrady.com shows how necessity historically structured private-use takings, offering a framework for thinking about public use today & going forward.

The Path Not Taken in Federal Takings Law

Debates from 19th century state conventions explain why some constitutions allow takings for "private use."

statecourtreport.org

My 4yo fell and split his head open at school. He asked for a popsicle, and the principal said “but your bump’s on the back of your head, popsicles are for bumps in your mouth.” He told her, “but my bones go all the way to the front.” He enjoyed the popsicle and I’m very worried about my future