Dr 〽️elody Ann Ross

@melodyannross.bsky.social

Linguist, long storyteller. Ask me about stuff, but flee immediately if I say “how much do you want to know about this?”

I am very pleased to finally share the briefing paper @dringebirnie.bsky.social, @melodyannross.bsky.social and I developed, entitled Reducing Friction: Addressing Inequalities Faced by Regional and Minority Languages of Europe in the Human-Machine Era: doi.org/10.6084/m9.f...

ADDRESSING INEQUALITIES FACED BY REGIONAL AND MINORITY LANGUAGES OF EUROPE IN THE HUMAN-MACHINE ERA

Rapid technological advances have signalled a shift towards the human-machine era. The human-machine era, characterised by its focus on communication through and with technology (Sayers et al., 2021), will continue to change the way in which language is used, and individuals use language to communicate and interact. These advances in technology have been recognised as creating opportunities to improve human rights, including creating and enhancing access to information, health education, and public services (United Nations 2023). However, the potential that technological advances and developments can bring to support improvements in human rights needs to be set against the (ongoing) challenges of maintaining linguistic and cultural diversity.Around 75% of the world’s languages are considered to be in danger of disappearing in the next century (UNESCO 2011). Currently the developments in technology are resulting in an increased linguistic homogeneity (The Centre for Internet and Society et al. 2022). Speakers of RMLs inherently have fewer resources and tools available to them in this domain, increasing the already existing digital divide. This inequality puts languages at risk of being ‘irrelevant and stigmatised’ (UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered languages 2003: 11). Therefore, language diversityand vitality, as well as the associated community identity and intangible cultural heritage, is linked to inclusion of these languages within technological advancements. This means resolute action is required to ensure that, in line with the United Nations Universal Declaration for Human Rights, everyone can ‘participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts, and to share in the scientific advancement and its benefits’ (United Nations 1948: Article 22, emphasis by the authors), with ‘technology [serving] as a force for good’ (United Nations 2023). The current and future impact of the advances in technology has been recognised at supranational level with the establishment of advisory bodies and committees to provide recommendations and prepare legislative frameworks which acknowledge the benefits and risks that these advances bring to human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. These actions have focused on minimising risks and providing regulatory measures for artificial intelligence within the human rights framework but have not directly considered, addressed, or referred to the accessibility and availability of these tools and applications in and for different minority or regional language users. This is the focus of this briefing paper.

doi.org

This is the first time all summer (I k no w) I’ve felt remotely *almost* caught up, and I think it has a lot to do with the first email reply I read this morning, which greeted me as “Lovely Melody”. I am working on too many projects, but they’re all starting to come together in different ways 🌱

Dear language diary, Today I said ‚gründungs Begründung‘ before I’d had any coffee and I thought it was gibberish but it turns out those are real words and I said them on purpose to communicate exactly what I meant! More later, Einfach das Coolste

I am becoming a character in a German course. First thing I did this morning was call a car rental company to changes the dates of my booking, exactly as foretold in the ancient texts (although I used ‚hergestellt‘ where I meant to use ‚eingestellt‘ but maybe it made me sound cool and poetic?)

If you’ve seen this article, you may be sitting with anger, pain, or just exhaustion at dealing with another helping of colonial nonsense. We feel a responsibility to speak back when these colonizing narratives show up, yet again, in such a prominent venue. endangeredlanguages.com/story/respon...

New Yorker article title "Sometimes It's Okay to Let a Language Die" with "Sometimes It's" crossed out in red ink and "IT'S NOT" written above it. To the right is text "A Response to The New Yorker" and the ELP logo.
The New Yorker@newyorker.com · 3mo ago

The idea that we have a special duty to prevent the death of languages is instantly compelling to anyone who loves languages. But is it true? www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...

I've been noticing some really local features in my German lately- I am fully Ich-Laut where you'd expect (z.B. kriechsset? / kriegst du es?), but the one that always stops me in my tracks is hearing myself delete it syllable finally (z.B. hammwa au? / haben wir auch?). Input is a powerful force!

This has just happened to me AGAIN and I had to say ‘sorry, when your email arrived at 9:30pm on Thursday I was already away from work. I then enjoyed the federal holidays on Friday and Monday and still did not read my email. GUESS YOU’LL HAVE TO WAIT’

Dr 〽️elody Ann Ross@melodyannross.bsky.social · 8mo ago

I’m currently on leave but was given edits over the weekend that were DUE MONDAY. I did them because I’m a preciously employed immigrant and publishing is what I pretend will someday secure my career but good lord, editors! Slow Science would change my life, fr

I’m currently on leave but was given edits over the weekend that were DUE MONDAY. I did them because I’m a preciously employed immigrant and publishing is what I pretend will someday secure my career but good lord, editors! Slow Science would change my life, fr

Alessandro Ingrosso@aingrosso.bsky.social · 8mo ago

The "publish or perish" culture must perish. Scientists need time to think. We just published our Slow Science Manifesto, where we argue that huge changes are needed in the way we fund, publish, and evaluate science. Read more and sign here: www.slow-science.com

Peer review is not there for you to tell experts in the field how you'd prefer the style of the paper to be, or what method or analysis you have a clear bias for. Your job is to check for correctness, spot errors or gaps, protect the integrity of the scientific method, not piss on others.

My spring/summer course is called “Language Ideologies in a Galaxy Far, Far Away”. There is so much good material, I am so very tired of my students’ media studies being done badly, and this is how I’m going to marry all my many academic loves into a single special interest polycule.

I had to take a German test recently, the studying for which brought me to tears multiple times because I was unavoidably confronted with the fact that my German has largely been *acquired* and not *learned* As a linguist, this is my ideal approach to language. As an immigrant, it was damaging.