michael ginn

@mginn.bsky.social

compling phd student @ boulder rare languages, morphology, finite state automata michaelginn.com

Really excited about this work w/ my long-time collaborators at Boulder! We address limitations in existing morphosyntactic annotation systems for digitally under-resourced languages and show how *jointly* predicting morphological segmentation helps with glossing performance

michael ginn@mginn.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Excited to announce that the PolyGloss paper has been accepted to @aclmeeting.bsky.social! Previously, we trained models to help in endangered language documentation workflows by automatically predicting interlinear glosses. But real-world user studies revealed crucial issues...

Excited to announce that the PolyGloss paper has been accepted to @aclmeeting.bsky.social! Previously, we trained models to help in endangered language documentation workflows by automatically predicting interlinear glosses. But real-world user studies revealed crucial issues...

Bild

There’s no conspiracy to make tech products worse by AI in things, AI is just very immediately and clearly productivity enhancing to the people making tech products in a way that it isn’t necessarily to the people using them.

Been reading a lot of old-school finite-state automata papers for a project It is so refreshing to read an interesting, colorfully-written paper that isn’t hyperoptimized for reviewer preferences

I have very mixed feelings on the current era in tech—I started a PhD because I thought LLMs were pretty cool, but I absolutely cannot stand the disingenuous hype, insane competitiveness, and slop features that have since come with them

I’m a big proponent of an accumulating reviewer score (complementary to h-index). I think people would absolutely care about optimizing it even with no concrete incentive.

Joe Stacey@joestacey.bsky.social · 2y ago

Okay genius idea to improve quality of #nlp #arr reviews. Literally give gold stars to the best reviewers, visible on open review next to your anonymously ID during review process. Here’s why it would work, and why would you should RT this fab idea:

I feel like reviewers often expect short papers to be long papers condensed into 4 pages. They should really be a venue to showcase focused and incremental work.

Just got ICL surgery (implantable lenses) and on one hand, modern medicine is incredible, but on the other hand seeing your eye get sliced open is terrifying