Michael Markie

@mmmarksman.bsky.social

All things Open Science/Open Data/Open Research. Head of Innovation Initiatives at eLife, Director of Community at ICOR

eLife Pathways has joined @cairos.network, a dedicated space for open science projects to collaborate & solve problems together. We'll collaborate on a future of knowledge sharing centred on modular publishing, structured discourse & collective intelligence.🌐👇 elifepathways.org/blog/post-18...

eLife Pathways Joins CAIROS

eLife Pathways is joining the CAIROS network, a cooperative federation dedicated to building open and sustainable research commons.

elifepathways.org

eLife Pathways is now stewarding Kotahi. In a new era of sharing, reviewing and curating research, it's important that there are open-source technologies that can experiment with more connected research outputs and support more modular, machine-readable science: elifepathways.org/blog/post-11...

eLife Pathways is now stewarding Kotahi

eLife Pathways is now stewarding Kotahi, the open-source publishing platform designed to support innovative publishing workflows, from submission to publication.

elifepathways.org

Excited to talk about modular science, Open Exchange Architecture, @curvenote.com and @continuous.foundation tomorrow. Will be a fun day learning all that is going on in this space. 🚀🚀

ATProto Science@atproto.science · 5mo ago

We're very honored to have @row1.ca & @matsulab.com as keynote speakers at #ATScience! Rowan & Matt will share their vision "Towards Modular Open Science" on moving beyond isolated papers toward a world of modular & interoperable research objects, leveraging #atproto as a decentralized backbone 🧪✨

A new report "Charting New Paths: The Promise of Alternative Publishing Practices." It was good to be interviewed for this, and it nicely explores different modes of sharing and reviewing research are bubbling away. Worth a read: 🔗 doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

Charting New Paths: The Promise of Alternative Publishing Practices

How does innovation arise in scientific publishing? Under what conditions can alternative publishing practices become established as the new standard? And what options for action are available to rese...

doi.org

2025 was a big year for us: @semble.so went from concept to working product, with 150 users in 2 months, a public API, and the wonderful atproto community already helping us build into the Atmosphere. We also co-launched @atproto.science and @cairos.network. Here's our year in review and what's next

Cosmik New Year: 2025 in Review, and Looking Forward to 2026

2025 was a big year for Cosmik: Semble went from concept to working product, with active users, a public API, and community members already building on top. We also launched the ATProto Science and CA...

blog.cosmik.network

New #NIH prize competition to identify areas of biomedical science that can benefit from replication and to recognize past replication efforts to further promote the importance of research replication: www.challenge.gov?challenge=re... Submission deadline is in one month!

Challenge.gov

Challenge.gov is the official government website supporting prize challenges and prize competitions that are sponsored by the US federal government. Here federal agencies provide prize awards to publi...

challenge.gov

Very much enjoyed last week's meeting in Cambridge about the Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) model for scholarly publishing. There were lots of highly inspiring discussions, including an important discussion about strengthening coordination between initiatives in this area. asapbio.org/reimagining-...

Reimagining Scholarly Publishing: Outcomes From A Public Forum To Discuss The Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) Publishing Model – ASAPbio

At a meeting held on the 3rd December 2025 at Kings College, Cambridge over 50 delegates, comprising researchers, publishers, librarians, research funders and

asapbio.org

Nature Sci Rep publishes incoherent AI slop. eLife publishes a paper which the reviewers didn't agree with, making all the comments and responses public with thoughtful commentary. One of these journals got delisted by Web of Science for quality concerns from not doing peer review. Guess which one?

Two posts from Bluesky. The first one shows a figure from a paper published in Nature Scientific Reports full of totally incoherent AI fabricated gibberish words. The other a comment on a recently published paper by eLife discussing the paper and its peer reviews which were published along with the paper.