Nicolas Clairis

@nclairis.bsky.social

Postdoc passionate about effort-based decision-making and the roots of effort aversiveness. If you are on Mastodon, my profile is: @nicolasclairis@fediscience.org

Based on much evidence that many publishers use the pressure to publish open access (OA) as a means to increase the article processing charges (APCs) I wanted to verify the assumption that for-profit OA journals are more expensive than for-profit non-OA journals in our where to publish database

Adoption of open access is rising – but so too are its costs - LSE Impact

Options available to authors to make their work open access are on the rise. Adoption of open access itself is also rising, and usage of open-access materials is similarly increasing. However, alongsi...

blogs.lse.ac.uk

Based on our WhereToPublish database, we were curious to see if the APCs depend on the publisher type and with relatively no surprise at all, the journals that are for-profit are way above: For-profit journals = 2635 +/- 37€ (mean +/- sem) Non-profit & University Press journals = 1996 +/- 63€ 1/4

Bild

🧵 New paper in @NatureComms Feedback-induced attitudinal changes in risk preferences Nasioulas, Potier, Cerrotti, Lebreton & me (2026) Does feedback really improve risky decision-making? Short answer: no! it changes attitudes, not learning. 👇 rdcu.be/e0VcO

Feedback-induced attitudinal changes in risk preferences

Nature Communications - Normative theory predicts that feedback should not affect decisions under risk, but past findings disagree. Here, the authors show that feedback shifts risk-taking by...

rdcu.be