No age gate South Africa

@noverifactionsa.bsky.social

Keeping south Africans alert on age verification, assurance technology. #noagegate #notodigitaldompas #no2digitaldompas #noverificationsa #savespeech

For the record when you ignore them coming for kinks you don't care for this is always the end result. No one should get to decide what is porn cuz it ain't EVER gonna line up with what any normal person would call porn.

Sam Cole@samleecole.bsky.social · 5d ago

a bunch of popular ASMR artists lost their channels forever this week, after YouTube cited them for violating terms against "sexually gratifying" content: www.404media.co/youtube-asmr...

Respectfully they should not be asking anyone of any degree to do this. Users should not be expected to ID check to get full access to their device - We should not have to ID our device to send age signals it's silly to pass this onto device makers as the central issue is "Who dictates access"

Mike Stabile@mikestabile.bsky.social · last wk.

"Pornhub sent a letter to 300 state officials on Tuesday, lambasting the 'performative, ineffective, and unenforceable age verification laws' that they helped to pass. The platform argues that age-gating should target device developers, rather than websites, to safeguard privacy and user safety."

X/twitter continues to be a bad place to try and share information on Government policy. Despite the fact we only repost and Create threads (often days apart) We still get the spam hammer. Can Governments just leave that site? You can see xenophobic accounts spam,but we get the routine hammer?

The great dumb discussion about "banning" VPNSs' is that any Grade 4-12 computer class or lesson in digital hygiene will tell you to use VPNs on public WiFi. We teach children don't use public WiFi without a VPN. Don't do sensitive tasks like transactions,doing documents on public WiFi without it.

Owen Boswarva@owenboswarva.bsky.social · 3w ago

Children's circumvention behaviours online www.gov.uk/government/p... report commissioned by UK Government, about how the little tikes are getting around age checks (including use of VPNs) Time for another poorly conceived policy intervention? #OnlineSafetyAct #censorship #childrights #techpolicy

VPN use

● Around a quarter of children use a VPN, and use rises sharply with age. Nearly 6 in 10 (58%) have heard of VPNs. A quarter (26%) say they have used one in their lifetime and around a fifth (22%) have used one in the last 3 months. Lifetime use rises from 17% of 11- to 12-year-olds to 31% of 16- to 17-year-olds.

● Among children who have used a VPN, use is frequent. Around two-thirds (64%) use one at least weekly.

● Children's reasons for using a VPN are focused on privacy and content. The most common reasons are to keep their activity private (30%), to access certain websites, apps or games (27%) and to watch videos from other countries (25%). Around a fifth of VPN users (22%) say they use one specifically to reach age-restricted websites, apps or games, which equates to 7% of all children saying they use a VPN to reach age-restricted websites, apps or games.

● Most children who use a VPN feel safer for doing so, and value their privacy highly. Eight in 10 VPN users (81%) say it makes them feel safer online. Privacy matters to 86% of all children, rising to 90% among lifetime VPN users and falling to 84% in non-VPN users.

● Parents are often involved in children’s VPN use. Of the 26% who have used a VPN in their lifetime, 22% had been helped by a parent to set it up, and 43% of child VPN users say a parent pays for it, while 36% say their VPN is free.

Discussing Privacy and the greater impact of Age verification in South Africa a guide🧵 #1 You will not receive media coverage on the basis of privacy concerns or information access. The primary framing of Age verification in SA is - Parents rights - Teenagers feeling worse after using social media

We a year later are still playing the song and dance of Ofcom trying to age gate Wikipedia,like its' been a whole year and we are back to this discussion at its' anniversary. I wonder if like last year people will be downloading copies of Wikipedia for offline use. AV is access control not saftey.

Owen Boswarva@owenboswarva.bsky.social · 4w ago

Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/07... update from @wikimediafoundation.org #Wikipedia #censorship #openweb #techpolicy

UPDATE — On 10 July 2026, the Wikimedia Foundation was notified by Ofcom that Wikipedia is not currently deemed a Category 1 service under the Online Safety Act (OSA). However, as part of that announcement, Ofcom informed the Foundation that Wikipedia will remain on a "watch list" of platforms that do not currently qualify as Category 1 services, but that could become Category 1 at any point in the future, should Ofcom choose to reassess its decision. 

While the Foundation is relieved by Ofcom's agreement that Wikipedia is not a Category 1 service, future Category 1 designation remains an existential threat to Wikipedia, open knowledge, and the privacy and safety of the global community of volunteers who create the information on the site. Without any clear and sustainable limits to categorization, Wikipedia remains vulnerable should Ofcom choose to reassess its decision. The Foundation will continue to advocate for safeguarding public-interest spaces like Wikipedia, asking for a careful re-scoping of the OSA and its Categorization Regulations.

3 mos. after the ban went into effect: "...Australian authorities reported that close to 70% of under-16 accts were still active... And teenagers... are good at the workaround... The bans could, perversely, strip away the protections that came w/ having a proper acct in the 1st place." 🛟😷🧭 policy

Governments Are Banning Teens from Social Media Without Any Evidence It Will Help

Australia switched it on in December. Anyone under 16, locked out of their social media accounts, by law. France, Spain, Denmark, Norway, India, Egypt and

scienceblog.com

The Australian under-16 social media ban would garner more hatred from Australians if it wasn't mostly-empty political theater. However, it is having some success teaching children they should lie to get what they want www.theguardian.com/media/2026/j...

Four in five under-16s in Australia using social media despite ban, study shows

Experts say law not enough to stop children accessing harmful content online and more ‘convincing strategy is required’

theguardian.com

What these people are actually supporting is total and complete removal of anonymity from the web, and cutting off millions of vulnerable kids lifelines and ability to get news and information abt the world, all for zero benefit and lots of harm

Majority of Americans support banning social media for kids under 16

Across major demographic and partisan groups, more Americans support than oppose banning those under 16 from using social media.

pewresearch.org

Banning kids under 16 from social media is a terrible idea. First of all, it doesn’t work. Second of all, the idea is that you’re going to introduce all of social media to someone at age 16 and expect that to go well

The UK government choosing the foot shooting policy of banning youth from social media should be seen as what it is communication and Information access denial. Social media is where most public statement's and commication happens between leaders, government offices and company statement's 🧵1

Alot of the anti migrant retorhic has accelerated alot of the call for survialance systems and Digital ID which are linked to many of The better privacy Projects campaigns. In this swell of hate alot of infrastructure is being proposed,fast tracked and launched. We are doing our best but its hard.

Al Jazeera English@aljazeera.com · 2mo ago

Thousands of migrants shelter in Durban park after being driven from their homes ahead of a June 30 expulsion ultimatum.

Our statement on the UK gov't's demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the UK be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification & content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all. signal.org/blog/pdfs/20...

signal.org

🚨Final day tomorrow to submit public comments on amendments to the identification act of 1997. It also outlines Digital ID policy in south Africa We are submitting ours which touches aspects of survialance creep and lack of public input on the whole scheme. Final day to submit is tomorrow 6 June.

No age gate South Africa@noverifactionsa.bsky.social · 3mo ago

🚨🚨Policy relating to South Africa's draft Digital ID paper 🆔Amendments to Identity regulation and outline of operation,biometric capture for digital identity 0 coverage Name:54610 4-5 Home Affairs Published:4 May 2026 Submit comment by:6 June 2026 Comment📄 www.gpwonline.co.za/government-g...

Reposting, because I'm not seeing a lot of non-NSFW artists talking about this and I'm starting to see the accounts go down If you want to see NSFW Art specifically-- remember to set your "Sexually Suggestive (cartoon)" setting to warn/show It's a totally different setting to the other NSFW labels

This is the future of the net, systems,automations deciding what you can view. Dont scoff it as just porn hides how wide reaching this could be. -LGBTQIA groups -Reproductive images/info -War/news footage -Eyewitness accounts The ability to hide someone in their entirety should scare us all

𖤐 💀 demon smut 𖤐@teethgrip.bsky.social · 2mo ago

dear god just saw how an it looks when someone's hit with the account wide adult content warning and it's fucking MISERABLE blurred icon, blurred banner, every single post is hidden, even text posts, and posts that have images require you to hit unhide TWICE for the text and image, fucking nightmare

Twitter/X continues to degrade in terms of campaigning options. Glad we use it manly as a platform to just to monitor and communicate with Mps,the continued feature locking,bots,hostile users makes it a secondary priority while unfortunately being the primary place statements and gov coms are made

twitter x limits

DM/direct messages (daily) limit 500 messages sent per day

posts 50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts.

changes to account email: 4 per hour

following (daily) 400 per dayNikita Bier

"how tf are you posting 50x a day and not verified (laugh emoji,laugh emoji) You cant even DM half the site without verification"