Owen Barcala

@obarcala.bsky.social

I would prefer not to. NM civil litigator. Trials, appeals, plaintiff, defense, you name it. Opinions are my own, not my firm's #USMC

ICYMI last night, DHS is currently being fined every day for contempt of court until it coughs up the cell phone records of officers involved in immigration stops in L.A. last year that looked like racial profiling rather than reasonable cause. short thread -->

Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 17h ago

Fed. judge holds DHS in civil contempt of court for refusing "intentionally and not in good faith" to provide plaintiffs with phone images they intend to use to prove DHS was racially profiling people arrested in Los Angeles without reasonable suspicion. Order from July 28, unsealed today.

B. Defendants’ Noncompliance Is Intentional And Not In Good Faith. Having found that Defendants are in violation of the January 16 Forensic Imaging Order, the burden now shifts to Defendants to show that they were unable to comply. Affordable Media, 179 F.3d at 1239 (9th Cir. 1999). They fail to make that showing. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and counsel’s representations at the hearing, it does not appear that Defendants’ noncompliance is due to an inability to comply. Instead, the clear and convincing evidence shows that Defendants have acted intentionally and not in good faith.

The Justice Department is admitting that a $14 million renovation on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC, was flawed, and is dropping the criminal case against a former Olympian that accused him of damaging the pool, according to a new court filing. https://cnn.it/3RJJnwj

Bild

Now that the Emily Wilson backlash has died down, I can finally ask my most important question from the Odyssey—what they hell were they eating at Circe's house? It looked like tapeworm stew

Got my car serviced 2 weeks ago and they recommended replacing the serpentine belt, now the engine won't turn over. I hope I'm not crazy to think that's connected somehow.

Super normal stuff: Citing "extraordinary" misconduct, the other six members of the Louisiana Supreme Court have forced the Chief Justice to recuse himself from a case (after he refused to do so on his own).

Bild

The case was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, not on the merits Might not want to spike the ball yet, especially since he had a default judgment entered against him for $250k before he finally got smart and defended it

The New Republic@newrepublic.com · last wk.

“PSA: Now that my case is settled, you are free to refer to @FBIDirectorKash as a ‘chud,’ a ‘googly-eyed Kremlin bitch,’ and a ‘traitor’ without fear of legal repercussions!” trib.al/e8IVBnp

It's pointless to get upset with classicists criticizing The Odyssey. They've been training for decades to complain that the original version of things is better than the modern take, it's practically the point of classicism.

The $50k discourse is revealing that not as many people have read Thinking, Fast & Slow as should have. There are a lot of weird brain heuristics that you don't even notice until they are pointed out to you.

Our office refrigerator has had a big tray of tiramisu in it all week, and someone keeps eating about 2 square inches of it each day, and I keep marveling at someone having the strength of will to do that

While I was watching the movie I kept thinking to myself, 'How many times are they going to say something about Zeus's law? Enough!' When Odysseus is talking to Penelope at the end it hit me—the law of hospitality was fundamental to civilization, and Odysseus thinks he's responsible for ending it

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò@olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 2w ago

more serious Odyssey opinion: leaning into the religious significance of the Trojan horse strategy (and the hospitality as central to civilization theme) was a good choice by Nolan and friends artistically and politically. strongest condemnation of our present era I'd expect from a mass market film

One of my partners used "gobbledygook" in a brief yesterday and looked up where that word came from. Reportedly, it was first used in a memo by a guy named Maury Maverick instructing his employees to write shorter memos, which is so good I might start passing it around to associates.

Bild

Now that I'm reading this on something other than my phone, there are like ten pages I could quote-post word for word. It is an absolute Festivus-level airing of grievances. I highly recommend reading pages 71-80 for anyone who feels like they've been taking crazy pills when they think about SCOTUS

Owen Barcala@obarcala.bsky.social · 2w ago

"When six justices walk away from those they are supposed to protect, state constitutions hold the line. That is not defiance. That is the design." The Supreme Court's credibility is starting to run dry with state courts.

Part of what makes the shadow docket so infuriating is SCOTUS trying to straddle the fence between these being "interim" rulings that don't need to be explained, but still "orders" that need to be followed. Can't be both. They need to pick a lane instead of doing this motte and bailey act.

Alex Aronson@alexaronson.bsky.social · 3w ago

Amy Coney Barrett just told Congress that it would be inappropriate to explain the reasoning behind the Court’s unreasoned shadow docket orders. As if unreasoned judicial orders are a thing. They are not. The reasoning is the whole point.