Pages Unbound

@pagesunbound.bsky.social

Book blogger since 2011. YA, MG, Classics, Fantasy, Discussions. Account run by Briana.

Baffled by this book I am reading where the premise is the entire town goes all out for Christmas. It’s a tourist attraction. The neighbors are painted as the obnoxious bad guys for having a million lights and music playing. Which are . . . standard things people who go “all out” for Christmas do.

I am sympathetic to the arguments you can't "fully" teach a book in 3 college class period, but that's kind of what happens if the course isn't based on just reading one single book at length. An English degree isn't like, "You took 12 classes and only read 12 books but DEEPLY."

YA book I am reading very overtly was making a point that was clearly a dig at generative AI, but then it had to really drive the point home by explicitly stating it was the same thing as if writing could be produced with the push of a button. Ah, YA, always directly stating the point. 🤣

The book I’m currently reading: Protagonist screaming at a police office: “Why don’t you understand I could have been killed?!” Second police officer shows up and explains the offender killed someone else and probably wanted the protagonist next. Protagonist: “You mean I could have been KILLED?”

Someone asked me why someone would bother AI generating book reviews. I assume it's the same reason(s) people used to plagiarize them the old-fashioned way. They don't know what to say. They think it makes them look impressive to have many reviews. They think it will get them ARCs. 🤷‍♀️

Goodreads should crack down on AI-generated reviews. How can I think the "reviewer" actually read the book if they can't say anything about it in their own words? They're essentially fake reviews ruining the trustiworthiness of the site.

I think "YA has few 'boy books'" is a fair statement, but I am baffled by the number of people who keep saying everything from picture books to middle grade has none. There are many books in MG! And many that try to be "neutral" like IMPOSSIBLE CREATURES, which is big right now.

Someone at work is explaining how great AI is by mentioning she almost once put a fake statistic in a presentation until she thought about it and asked AI for the source and there was none. Yes, but you can avoid this entirely by finding your own sources the old-fashioned way.

Sometimes I wonder what exactly constitutes a "boy book." Is The Hunger Games ok for boys? The protagonist is a girl, but it has violence, which is a stereotypical thing people think boys wish to read about. Is The Golden Compass for boys? The protagonist is a girl, but a man wrote it.

If nothing else, the people claiming there "are no books for boys or men" demonstrate that publishing needs to reinvent its marketing strategy. These books 100% exist, but everyone's claiming not to know this.

This article is gathering some rather amazing responses on Twitter, where people are claiming all the "boy books" like Tom Sawyer have been banned and that "there are no books for boys ages 3-7." That's right. No PICTURE BOOKS or LEVELED READERS that "aren't girly" exist. People say anything online.

I went out and came back home to find some family members using my Easton Press books and some MinaLima books as weights for crafts in direct sun in the window, and I don't even know who to complain about this to who would understand why I'm annoyed. 🤣

Apparently if you post that you disagree with how morality is portrayed in a book, you get accused of "wanting books to be religious instruction manuals." Look, I still enjoyed the book, but I also think its morality is completely wrong! Both things can be true at the same time!