Patch Zircher

@patrickzircher.bsky.social

Writer. Artist. Colorist. Making new Solomon Kane adventures and Savage Sword of Conan stories for Heroic Signature & Titan Comics! Professional mooncalf.

Latest read, Man and His Symbols (1964) by Carl G. Jung and associates; Jung on the exploration of the unconscious, and essays by his associates. Includes dream interpretation, human sexuality (anima & animus), repression (the shadow). "Your wife has a great animus. Jah?" -- Carl Jung #BookSky

Bild

I had a rather obvious epiphany about 20 years ago. You can read any damn thing you want. Not just the genre entertainment. Truth is, most people read that. But the 'high-brow' stuff too. It's the high-brow stuff that is really looked on with suspicion and derision.

If his followers started smearing orange whatever-that-is on their face in imitation of the pres it would be like being in a science fiction satire. A Stanislaw Lem book or something. I kind of want it to happen so I can finally say, see? Clearly the world is bat-shit crazy.

Imagine if people's heads physically shrank or enlarged based on reading. While it'd make some things apparent (where did the president's head go?) it'd also suck to need a neck brace for a giant head. Now if reading turned you, I don't know, silver and not reading, say, Orange-- that'd work.

Reading Jung's Man and His Symbols and I don't want to seem anti-academic but when an academic dreams he's being physically attacked, there's a pretty good chance he was acting like a jerk the day before :) Especially as Jung frequently leads with "an intelligent man will, an educated man considers"

Been reading a massive book (900 pgs) of Thomas Hardy poems. He goes Hyborian Big this morning: If but some vengeful God would call to me From up the sky, and laugh: "Thou suffering thing, Know that thy sorrow is my ecstasy, That thy love's loss is my hate's profiting!"

I love crime stories that have a terrifying badass who thinks its his right to mete out death-- and the lawman in the other chapters, whose been eating at diners, a regular guy-- and the lawman abruptly meets the badass & puts a bullet between the bastard's eyes almost immediately-- impersonally.

I watched an interview with another comic artist (Paul Pelletier) and he said he was a book guy, that translating words to images was just how his brain works now after decades of doing it -- and I thought, "It's not just me."

Latest read, Perdita Durango (1995) by Barry Gifford; the author of Wild at Heart writes a wicked novel about a "half Tex, half Mex" bombshell & her equally psychopathic amour. Snapping, brutal crime fic. If you consider there are people actually like these characters, you'll feel uneasy. #BookSky

Bild

15 yrs ago I used to argue in favor of the old open script/classic Marvel method (the writer gave you a loose plot, and they scripted (aside from a few key phrases) after you drew the comic). I realize, as an artist then, I argued for this because I wanted to write-- to create scenes.

I was an artist-only for 20 years and I know all the excuses :) They are less often concerned with the narrative than "I didn't want to draw a helicopter." That sounds harsh coming from an artist but I've seen it. A good work ethic is important for artists too. Those who have it will do fine.

Gideon Knight@glknightwrites.bsky.social · 2d ago

Wholeheartedly agreed. As someone who only writes, I fully believe in the story not just being mine but my whole team's. They did the work, they deserve to have a say and take credit as storytellers. But I draw the line at immaturely trying to change a story to control certain narrative beats.

See, I don't like the idea of not being able to write something concrete-- only suggestions. Hell of a way to make a story. It's not a freedom issue, it's a maturity issue. Freedom for a collaborating artist is choosing angles, longshots, close-ups, designs, setting details-- not changing the story.

white@iamnothereatall.bsky.social · 2d ago

I had a few things that never made it to print because I ditched the artists when they race swapped intentionally black characters. Or just completely ignored other elements of the script without discussion. Most of what I write visually can be regarded as suggestions open to discussion. Others...

Used to argue with comic writers about their method. No outline? Are you nuts! You go wherever the story's going? Nuts! THEN I found out an artist not drawing what's in the script was more common than I realized, and if you wrote watertight--they were going to punch a whole in the bag regardless.

I grew up in print. First thing, when I was 8 years old. Drawings in the Kids Page of the local paper. I won a state-wide poster contest in the 6th grade. At the end of high school I had my first spot illustrations showing up in role-playing games. All the mistakes 'immortalized' :)

I still hear my mom when I draw a head. I'm 12 years old and she's telling me "Don't make the head too long. The head is wider at the brow than at the jawline. The eye is wider a third of the way from the nose than at the middle. Eyebrow hair angles downward toward the nose."