Scott Radnitz

@radnitz.bsky.social

Ellison Professor of Russian and Eurasian Studies, Jackson School of International Studies, Univ. of Washington; affiliate of UW Center for an Informed Public. Post-Soviet politics, conspiracy theories, mis/disinformation. Jean Monnet Fellow, EUI 2022-23.

Nominees are all hacks/loyalists or ideologues. Which is worse? I think ideologues, because they will damage an agency beyond what they're ordered to do. McMahon (DOE) is a loyalist. Bondi, like Gaetz--mostly loyalists. Gabbard (DNI) is both--she can (and would probably like to) do real harm.

Most analyses are about the harm to US democracy. All true. But these appointments are also intended to damage the state --the postwar institutions that help protect public health and provide a decent standard of living, and have survived several hostile Republican administrations.

Brendan Nyhan@brendannyhan.bsky.social · 2y ago

Just so we're clear on where we are: -The President: an authoritarian who attempted a coup -A Secretary of Defense who defends war crimes -A Attorney General credibly accused of sex crimes -A Director of National Intelligence who defends Putin and Assad -An HHS director who opposes vaccines