Randy Boyes

@randy.pub

Analytics at @presage.group | PhD Epidemiology | Wolfe Island Volunteer Firefighter | #julialang #python #rstats | publications at www.randy.pub | GitHub @rdboyes

Cool study, and I’m convinced they’re generally correct. Very high lizardman quotient in this figure though - if you’re not getting 100% strong agreement that “betting (real money)” is a form of gambling, something is off, and the SVK sample “strong agree” for that item is <50%

Veli-Matti Karhulahti@mkarhulahti.bsky.social · 6mo ago

behold, we found great variation in how people think! Many activities that we thought would be “gaming” weren't & vice versa, eg half of the participants interpreted ‘gambling’ to be ‘gaming’. Ergo: surveying ‘gaming’ without defining it creates data mess

These values are required to do science - acting like this is a problem is like saying that CEOs valuing “professionalism” or “punctuality” more than the average person means they aren’t value-aligned with the average person

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias.bsky.social · last yr.

There’s a big gap on *values* (not facts) between scientific experts and the mass public, which is driving a lot of the crisis of confidence in institutions and expertise. www.slowboring.com/p/the-crisis...