Randy Besco

@randybesco.bsky.social

Political Science at the University of Toronto. Elections and Voting. Immigration, Race and Ethnicity. Political Psychology. Recently, a bit of work environmental attitudes.

Its baffling to me why prominent Democrats aren't loudly and repeatedly saying "after we win the next election we are going to vigorously investigate everyone who give money to Trump". It works both ways, as deterrence and as campaigning.

Daniel Drezner@dandrezner.bsky.social · last mo.

It’s worth repeating on a regular basis: the Trump administration’s corruption is truly unprecedented. I get why Trump is seeking bribes. What I’m less sure about is how the bribers think this will end. danieldrezner.substack.com/p/the-corrup...

LLM just said "I appreciate you being direct". Are they getting passive aggressive now? It was bad enough when my printer started talking, not sure I can handle sass from my computer.

A fun little update of the data from this book - this year possibly the highest number of floor-crossings ever (at least since 1990s)? For non-Canadians: multiple floor crossings to the Liberal Party recently, which is on the edge of a majority.

Bild
Jared Wesley@jaredwesley.ca · 5mo ago

Mark Carney is now one seat away from a majority. In our book (partyloyalty.ca), we discuss the strains that floor-crossing places on both parties... + vancouver.citynews.ca/2026/04/08/s...

The last few years have really made it clear that people (including academics) basically only have substantive preferences, almost no procedural principles at all. Majoritarianism? Sovereignty? Plain text of constitutions? All completely flipped ideologically. Even among experts!

You're too busy and don't have time to do all the reviews? Easy step one, stop reviewing for Elsevier journals. Later you can also stop editing and submitting to them. (sorry to Electoral Studies, but this calls for market discipline, time to devalue those assets)

John Drury@profjohndrury.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Elsevier are not only rip-off merchants in relation to university libraries but provide perhaps the worst experience for peer reviewers of any of the publishers.

So LLMs have guidelines about discussing presidents? Trying out ChatGTP5.2, and it reasons: "OK, I’m thinking through how to respect guidelines on discussing influential politicians. Redirecting to general topics like race and elections research instead of focusing on Obama as an individual."

Reviewing PhD applications for next year, and I can't believe the number and quality of them. We always have good applicants, but this year we could easily admit three full cohorts. And I suspect the acceptance rate will be really high too.

I was an external examiner for a PhD defense for the first time today, and it was a great experience. I went in person rather than zoom. That has costs, but I think its worth it. Partly because its an important event, but also somehow being in person makes it important. 10/10 would examine again.

New work on on Immigration attitudes, out in @irpp.org with @natashagoel.bsky.social We show dramatical increase in anti-immigration opinion in Canada over the past couple of years. Its very different than previous shifts like in 1990s...

IRPP@irpp.org · 9mo ago

In 2015, only 16% strongly agreed Canada had too much immigration. By 2024, that number doubled to 33%. This IRPP paper by @randybesco.bsky.social and @natashagoel.bsky.social reveals a striking reversal in Canadians’ views on immigration: centre.irpp.org/research-stu...

This an interesting phrasing from the Minister of Indigenous services. "Canadians and Indigenous peoples" echoes a common phrasing "Canadians and Quebecers" used by Quebec nationalist politicians as a way of emphasizing that these are two separate groups of peoples.

Bild

The Paper Skygest feed is excellent and you should all add it. If you want to see research/paper posts, its clearly the best thing around. Almost like old academic twitter.

Nikhil Garg@nkgarg.bsky.social · last yr.

*Please repost* @sjgreenwood.bsky.social and I just launched a new personalized feed (*please pin*) that we hope will become a "must use" for #academicsky. The feed shows posts about papers filtered by *your* follower network. It's become my default Bluesky experience bsky.app/profile/pape...

Here is a fun chart: turnout over time. Contrary to popular wisdom, there is no long slow decline. In fact, there is a single, permeant step down in 2000. I'm pretty sure I know why, but surely someone has published on this before?

Bild