It was actually just recently that Wambu and I debated on talking about this, but quickly concluded that it would be best to leave him in his sad irrelevancy. Now that this has gained traction, I will second everything that Wambu said. Luckily, he is not good enough at ragebaiting to stay relevant.
@wambu.bsky.social · 4d agoAs a final nail on what I said about LEGO_Vince last night, here he is trying to ragebait a trans former friend of his by leveraging a super traumatic thing that happened to her 6 years ago, dead naming her, and calling it "good times." Bro is a two-faced ghoul through and through. Avoid him.
![SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 25A97
NETCHOICE, LLC v. LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MISSISSIPPI
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY
[August 14, 2025]
The application to vacate stay presented to JUSTICE ALITO and by him referred to the Court is denied.
JUSTICE KAVANAUGH, concurring in the denial of the application to vacate stay.
I concur in the Court's denial of NetChoice's application for interim relief because NetChoice has not sufficiently demonstrated that the balance of harms and equities favors it at this time. See Response in Opposition 37-39.
To be clear, NetChoice has, in my view, demonstrated that it is likely to succeed on the merits-namely, that enforcement of the Mississippi law would likely violate its members' First Amendment rights under this Court's precedents. See Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, 603 U. S. 707
(2024); Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn., 564 U. S. 786 (2011); cf. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, 606 U.S. _ (2025). Given those precedents, it is no surprise that the District Court in this case enjoined enforcement of the Mississippi law and that seven other Federal District Courts have likewise enjoined enforcement of similar state laws.
See No. 1:24-cv-170 (SD Miss., June 18, 2025);
NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, 716 F. Supp. 3d 539 (SD Ohio
2024); Computer & Communications Industry Assn. v.
Paxton, 747 F. Supp. 3d 1011 (WD Tex. 2024); NetChoice, LLC v. Reyes, 748 F. Supp. 3d 1105 (Utah 2024); NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta, 770 F. Supp. 3d 1164 (ND Cal. 2025);](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreiaaptfaxmw52wh5ndszqglcjgdqwrj5c2sopkgsjbedx72sdzllc4)
