Dr. Riley Pizza

@rileypizza.bsky.social

Postdoc at Arizona State University || Equitable teaching practices & Restoration Seed Sourcing|| PhD Michigan State University || M.S University of Minnesota Duluth || 🏳️‍⚧️They/Them🏳️‍⚧️

Me: checking the manuscript portal every day *aghast* that reviewers have not immediately dropped everything to read my incredible manuscript. Also me: Continuing to ignore the paper I need to peer-review before next week because other things keep capturing my attention. 💀

A heartfelt thank you to federal scientists of the USA. The authors of this piece reflect on the massive losses that occurred in 2025 — 10,109 PhDs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and health — either voluntarily or involuntarily. 17% of the workforce gone in a single year!

Federal scientists, a great American invention: a letter to our federal colleagues

Click on the article title to read more.

esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Is the peer review process broken? Yes. Do I also LOVE reviewing papers because it exposes me to the newest findings, up-and-coming junior scientists who I need to follow, and gets me to ACTUALLY read a paper top-to-bottom? Also yes.

OK y'all asking for advice: When i was a little grad student I always had 1 project in development, 1 project being written up, and 1 project in review. Now as a postdoc and finishing up my PhD stuff I have about 3x that many projects in all those stages. How do you stay on top of it all?

This is the reality that trans academics live in. You think the job market is bad for YOU? Imagine what it's like for someone who can't safely work in over half of the country. If you live in one of these red states, your department is missing out on amazing scientists. Science is political.

Alejandra Caraballo@esqueer.net · 5mo ago

I analyzed over 10 years of anti-trans legislation. Over 330 bills have passed, with ~300 of them in just the last 5 years. There is no precedent in American history for so many bills to target one particular minority group like this in such a short timeframe. www.thedissident.news/the-ratchet/

Hot tip: When reviewing a paper, please try to be specific about what changes are needed to clarify something, or rectify a problem. Signed, someone who is about to hire a psychic to try and read the mind of reviewer #3 whose signature catchphrase is simply "Needs more detail". 😩

I'm doing interviews with students with ADHD and after the interview I told them that I had ADHD and the student was like "I've never seen an ADHD adult be so successful...I guess I really can become a doctor" 🥹🥹🥹 Tell your students about your struggles, I promise it has an impact.

A student with ADHD forgets to book a testing center appt. and loses their accommodation. A student's anxiety keeps them from sharing accommodations with profs. If using accommodations requires skills make inherently harder by their disability, is the system working? tinyurl.com/yymn8cne

Do students need accommodations for their accommodations?

Students with disabilities need accommodations so they can focus on learning. But when accessing those accommodations requires skills they don’t have, is the system really working?

tinyurl.com

OK y'all--has everyone just given up on providing critical peer reviews? The last two papers I've reviewed I've listed several points of feedback and the other reviewer has just said "no notes looks good 👍" Like, if we're not going to be good reviewers why bother doing it?