Kristian Roed Nielsen

@roednielsen.bsky.social

🎓Associate Professor of Sustainable Consumption and Innovation at Copenhagen Business School 📚 Study human decision-making & behavior, sustainable action, and somewhat randomly crowds 🌍 linktr.ee/kristianroed

📢 Postdoc opportunity | Consumer Behaviour & Sustainability (CBS) 🔬 The role Experimental consumer research Focus on sustainable food consumption, policy, & food environments 📅 Start: April 2026 (flexible) ⏳ Duration: 29 months (extendable) 🗓 Deadline: 16 Feb 2026 Feel free to share with anyone 🌱

Postdoc in Consumer Behaviour and Sustainability at the Department of Management, Society and Communication (MSC)

MSC is looking for a Postdoc interested in experimental consumer research to join an international project on sustainable food consumption.

cbs.dk

Still thinking about that scholar who implied replicators just weren't skilled enough to reproduce the effects he uncovered. Sure, lab and field experiments are incredibly hard to set up well. But if our findings are that fragile, what are we even doing?

I like Ryan’s paper and (obviously) I think complexity matters for behavior. But I think Florian’s updating too much from one experiment. I want to see replications and results from ‘nearby’ designs before saying the lottery anomalies have nothing to do with risk.

Florian Ederer @florianederer.bsky.social · 2y ago

Some of the most important lottery anomalies from the behavioral risk literature (e.g., probability weighting and loss aversion) actually have nothing to do with risk. They also arise in perfectly deterministic settings. Lead article in the latest AER issue: www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=...